Expectancy theory: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
Line 11: Line 11:


'''Expectancy'''
'''Expectancy'''
Expectancy, or also called effort-performance expectancy, describes the degree to which a person believes that putting in effort will result in the expected level of performance <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. Thus, expectancy consists of an action-outcome interconnection <ref>Miner 2005, p. 98</ref>. An employee who believes that an increase in effort for their work will also lead a better performance would therefore have a high effort-performance expectancy <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>.
Expectancy, or also called effort-performance expectancy, describes the degree to which a person believes that putting in effort will result in the expected level of performance <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. Thus, expectancy consists of an action-outcome interconnection <ref>Miner 2005, p. 98</ref>. An employee who believes that an increase in effort for their work will also lead a better performance would therefore have a high effort-performance expectancy <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>.


'''Instrumentality'''
'''Instrumentality'''
Instrumentality refers to a person’s belief that a good performance will lead to a valid outcome or reward <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. Therefore, instrumentality can also be called performance-outcome expectancy. Accordingly, a person who delivers a high performance but is not rewarded appropriately will have a rather low perceived instrumentality. Instrumentality describes an outcome-outcome interconnection <ref>Miner 2005, p. 98</ref>.
Instrumentality refers to a person’s belief that a good performance will lead to a valid outcome or reward <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. Therefore, instrumentality can also be called performance-outcome expectancy. Accordingly, a person who delivers a high performance but is not rewarded appropriately will have a rather low perceived instrumentality. Instrumentality describes an outcome-outcome interconnection <ref>Miner 2005, p. 98</ref>.


'''Valence'''
'''Valence'''
Valence describes how valuable a person perceives a possible reward or outcome of their work to be <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. In general, a positive valence would indicate that an employee would prefer having the outcome to not having it, a negative valence would mean a person would not like to achieve the outcome <ref>Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 97</ref>.
Valence describes how valuable a person perceives a possible reward or outcome of their work to be <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50</ref>. In general, a positive valence would indicate that an employee would prefer having the outcome to not having it, a negative valence would mean a person would not like to achieve the outcome <ref>Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 97</ref>.


==Managerial implications==
==Managerial implications==
According to expectancy theory, managers should have knowledge about employees’ needs, make outcomes of their work clear to them and ensure that everyone is able to achieve said outcomes, in order to foster employee motivation <ref>Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 120</ref>. In other words, managers should try to maximize their employees’ expectancy, instrumentality and valence <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 51</ref>. Increased expectancy could for example be achieved by training or clarification of goals. Valence could be maximized by aligning rewards with employees’ needs. Clearly communicating the possible outcomes of good work could be a means to increase perceived instrumentality.
According to expectancy theory, managers should have knowledge about employees’ needs, make outcomes of their work clear to them and ensure that everyone is able to achieve said outcomes, in order to foster employee motivation <ref>Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 120</ref>. In other words, managers should try to maximize their employees’ expectancy, instrumentality and valence <ref>Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 51</ref>. Increased expectancy could for example be achieved by training or clarification of goals. Valence could be maximized by aligning rewards with employees’ needs. Clearly communicating the possible outcomes of good work could be a means to increase perceived instrumentality.

Revision as of 13:25, 7 November 2022

Page in progress

Expectancy theory is a specific area of motivation theory, focusing on how employee’s expectations regarding their ability to execute tasks and achieve desired rewards can affect their work motivation and organizational behavior [1]. It is seen as part of the contemporary theories on motivation [2]. In general, expectancy theory states that motivation is dependent on three different beliefs an employee can hold [3]: expectancy (E), instrumentality (I) and valence (V). Thus, motivation according to expectancy theory can be described as:

Motivation = E x I x V

While different expectancy theories exist, the first theory focusing on work motivation in particular has been developed by Victor Vroom in 1964 [4].

Expectancy factors

According to expectancy theory, an employee’s motivation is the outcome of the following three factors. It is important for managers to pay attention to each factor, since a theoretical score of zero for one of the factors would lead to an overall score of zero in motivation, as visible in the equation presented above Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 51.

Expectancy

Expectancy, or also called effort-performance expectancy, describes the degree to which a person believes that putting in effort will result in the expected level of performance [5]. Thus, expectancy consists of an action-outcome interconnection [6]. An employee who believes that an increase in effort for their work will also lead a better performance would therefore have a high effort-performance expectancy [7].

Instrumentality

Instrumentality refers to a person’s belief that a good performance will lead to a valid outcome or reward [8]. Therefore, instrumentality can also be called performance-outcome expectancy. Accordingly, a person who delivers a high performance but is not rewarded appropriately will have a rather low perceived instrumentality. Instrumentality describes an outcome-outcome interconnection [9].

Valence

Valence describes how valuable a person perceives a possible reward or outcome of their work to be [10]. In general, a positive valence would indicate that an employee would prefer having the outcome to not having it, a negative valence would mean a person would not like to achieve the outcome [11].

Managerial implications

According to expectancy theory, managers should have knowledge about employees’ needs, make outcomes of their work clear to them and ensure that everyone is able to achieve said outcomes, in order to foster employee motivation [12]. In other words, managers should try to maximize their employees’ expectancy, instrumentality and valence [13]. Increased expectancy could for example be achieved by training or clarification of goals. Valence could be maximized by aligning rewards with employees’ needs. Clearly communicating the possible outcomes of good work could be a means to increase perceived instrumentality.

  1. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50; Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 120
  2. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 43
  3. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  4. ↑ Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 120; Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  5. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  6. ↑ Miner 2005, p. 98
  7. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  8. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  9. ↑ Miner 2005, p. 98
  10. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 50
  11. ↑ Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 97
  12. ↑ Mukherjee & Kumar Basu 2005, p. 120
  13. ↑ Rothmann & Cooper 2015, p. 51
Retrieved from "https://ceopedia.org/index.php?title=Expectancy_theory&oldid=65489"