Equity Risk Premium: Difference between revisions
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Theoretically, ERP is the return that investors [[need]] to become indifferent on the boundaries between having a risky [[market]] portfolio and a risk-free [[bond]]. | Theoretically, ERP is the return that investors [[need]] to become indifferent on the boundaries between having a risky [[market]] portfolio and a risk-free [[bond]]. | ||
Because compensation depends on future stock results, the stock [[price risk]] premium includes future returns on inventories that are not directly recorded. Ultimately, every ERP model is a representation of investor expectations. The most challenging activity in estimating ERP is fact that it is not clear what return on the market and a risk-free rate really represents in the real world. Practically speaking, the most accepted measures of total market returns are reached from wide-ranging stock market indices like S&P 500. Eventually, each of ERP models is a model of investor expectations. | Because compensation depends on future stock results, the stock [[price risk]] premium includes future returns on inventories that are not directly recorded. Ultimately, every ERP model is a representation of investor expectations. The most challenging activity in estimating ERP is fact that it is not clear what return on the market and a risk-free rate really represents in the real world. Practically speaking, the most accepted measures of total market returns are reached from wide-ranging stock market indices like S&P 500. Eventually, each of ERP models is a model of investor expectations. | ||
These principles do not include all listed shares and some elements of luxuriousness, for instance - real estate, private equity markets and private equity. Although we limit ourselves to all traded shares, decision makers have many choices, such as using values or indices of equal weight, and excluding penny or rarely listed shares. A similar problem occurs with the risk-free rate. Although we almost always use Treasury yields as a quantity of risk-free rates, they are not completely risk free because nominal Treasuries are lay open to inflation and liquidity risks, even though we assumed that there was no chance of total default (Busseti E. p 1-5 2010). | These principles do not include all listed shares and some elements of luxuriousness, for instance - real estate, private equity markets and private equity. Although we limit ourselves to all traded shares, decision makers have many choices, such as using values or indices of equal weight, and excluding penny or rarely listed shares. A similar problem occurs with the risk-free rate. Although we almost always use Treasury yields as a quantity of risk-free rates, they are not completely risk free because nominal Treasuries are lay open to [[inflation]] and liquidity risks, even though we assumed that there was no chance of total default (Busseti E. p 1-5 2010). | ||
==We can define ERP mathrmatically== | ==We can define ERP mathrmatically== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
This definition is very important and reveals some important conditions for ERP. | This definition is very important and reveals some important conditions for ERP. | ||
Initially, ERP excludes future return prospects and is stochastic because the result determined by new data which arrival is arbitrary and unknown. Also, it has a sort of [[investment horizon]] k that helps determine expected returns for a month, year, three years or more from today. Last but not least, all speculation is accurate because error <small>t+k</small> is stochastic. The capital risk premium is usually less than the real rate of return (Duarte F., Rosa C. p.2-4 2015). | Initially, ERP excludes future return prospects and is stochastic because the result determined by new data which arrival is arbitrary and unknown. Also, it has a sort of [[investment horizon]] k that helps determine expected returns for a month, year, three years or more from today. Last but not least, all speculation is accurate because error <small>t+k</small> is stochastic. The capital risk premium is usually less than the [[real rate of return]] (Duarte F., Rosa C. p.2-4 2015). | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 21:12, 19 March 2023
| Equity Risk Premium |
|---|
| See also |
Equity Risk Premium - the expected return on inventory exceeding the risk-free rate - is the basic amount of all asset valuations, both for theoretical and practical motives. This is a main degree of aggregate risk aversion and significant indicator of the cost of capital for businesses, individual savings determinations and budget strategies for governments. Lately, the capital risk premium (ERP) has also became a dominant as a most important indicator of economic development, a potential explanation of unemployment recovery and an indicator of financial stability
ERP definition
Theoretically, ERP is the return that investors need to become indifferent on the boundaries between having a risky market portfolio and a risk-free bond. Because compensation depends on future stock results, the stock price risk premium includes future returns on inventories that are not directly recorded. Ultimately, every ERP model is a representation of investor expectations. The most challenging activity in estimating ERP is fact that it is not clear what return on the market and a risk-free rate really represents in the real world. Practically speaking, the most accepted measures of total market returns are reached from wide-ranging stock market indices like S&P 500. Eventually, each of ERP models is a model of investor expectations. These principles do not include all listed shares and some elements of luxuriousness, for instance - real estate, private equity markets and private equity. Although we limit ourselves to all traded shares, decision makers have many choices, such as using values or indices of equal weight, and excluding penny or rarely listed shares. A similar problem occurs with the risk-free rate. Although we almost always use Treasury yields as a quantity of risk-free rates, they are not completely risk free because nominal Treasuries are lay open to inflation and liquidity risks, even though we assumed that there was no chance of total default (Busseti E. p 1-5 2010).
We can define ERP mathrmatically
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle 𝑅_t= 𝐸_t[𝑅_t+_k]+error_t+_k}
- 𝑅t+k make returns among t
- t+k and 𝐸𝑡[𝑅t+k] are expected, which is predicted from t to t + k at time t
- the error t+k formula is random, which is achieved at t and t + k
According to real expectations error t+k (mean 0 and perpendicular to 𝐸𝑡[𝑅t+k]) This is a general model and it fits many models, so we cannot assume rational expectations at this stage.
The horizon model in time t is interpreted as:
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle ERP_t(𝑘) = 𝐸_t[𝑅_t+_k]-R^f_t+_k} ,
- 𝑅t+k is risk free rate (from t to t+k)
This definition is very important and reveals some important conditions for ERP.
Initially, ERP excludes future return prospects and is stochastic because the result determined by new data which arrival is arbitrary and unknown. Also, it has a sort of investment horizon k that helps determine expected returns for a month, year, three years or more from today. Last but not least, all speculation is accurate because error t+k is stochastic. The capital risk premium is usually less than the real rate of return (Duarte F., Rosa C. p.2-4 2015).
References
- Busseti E., (2010) Risk and Return models for Equity Markets and Implied Equity Risk Premium, arXiv 1903.07737
- Cornell.B, (1999) Equity Risk Premium: The Long-Run Future of the Stock Market John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
- Duarte F., Rosa C., (2015), The Equity Risk Premium: A Review of Models, FRBNY Staff Reports, New York No.714
- Goetzmann W.N., Ibbotson R.G., (2006) The Equity Risk Premium: Essays and Explorations Oxford University Press, New York
- McCulloch B. (2005) The Market Equity Risk Premium The Treasury, New Zealand
Author: Karolina Kaproń
