Organic organization: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


*'''High administrative costs:''' This leads to high administrative costs, which reduce the turnover of the organisation. Furthermore, this structure is not feasible for organisations with limited funds.
*'''High administrative costs:''' This leads to high administrative costs, which reduce the turnover of the organisation. Furthermore, this structure is not feasible for organisations with limited funds.
*'''Confusion and lack of coordination:'''  
*'''Confusion and lack of coordination:''' In this model, many employees do not have a specific role within the organisation, which can lead to controversy and uncertainty. As it is a joint work, it is often not possible to carry out the chain successfully. If team members are not on the same page, it leads to a loss of efficiency that can affect the achievement of objectives.
*'''Communication problems:''' Too much information can do more harm than good and lead to miscommunication if not checked in time. Sometimes a free exchange of views can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings that can cause problems in the organisation.


==Footnotes==
==Footnotes==

Revision as of 18:59, 15 November 2022

The organisational structure refers to the management system of the organisation, which allows defining the functions of each management area of the company, as well as their hierarchy. An Organic Organisation is defined as an organisational structure in which all employees are on the same level. In this flat structure, interaction and communication are horizontal. Organic tissues are considered complex because they are difficult to form. According to Euroinnova, International Online Education.

History

Organic structures were proposed by Burns and Stalker in 1961 to explain the success of British electronics companies. Since then, Organic Organisation has become an integral part of non-bureaucratic organisation theory. The main pillars on which the authors based themselves to develop this new organisational concept were the following [1]:

  • Constantly adapt and redefine personal tasks through interactions with others.
  • Encourages taking responsibility for solving problems, not being moved up or down the ladder.
  • Control, authority and communication have a network structure.
  • Differences in knowledge needed to assign tasks in the network and move control, authority and communication to new locations.
  • Giving information and advice, not instructions and decisions.
  • A reputation for commitment to the "spirit of technology" rather than loyalty and obedience.
  • Prestige of affiliations and experience outside the company.

Characteristics

The main characteristics of this organisational model are as follows [2]:

Organic organisations emerge in dynamic or changing environments, it is therefore considered a flexible and adaptable model.

In terms of employee management, it is an organisation that bases its principles on teamwork and fostering group leadership. This means that different people are now empowered with leadership skills. It is a shared authority and not an individual one. Workers often have extensive training and multiple talents, so they can efficiently multi-task when needed. It considers what employees think and makes them feel part of the system. This serves as an incentive to improve efficiency, productivity and collaboration.

Power in an organic organisation is decentralised, and which are characterised by fluid lines of communication, unclear process descriptions and control based on staff expertise.

Types of Organic Organizational Structure?

Advantages

The main advantages of organic structures are the following [3]:

  • Flexible perspective: Organisational flexibility is one of the main success factors for companies that want to be well positioned in the market. Adaptability to changes in the environment and the demands of external customers.
  • Specialised and efficient work: These are highly trained personnel who have the ability to perform different types of tasks if required by the company at any time. This structure is also committed to teamwork, dividing staff into efficient working groups. All assigned members work together to achieve common project objectives.Managers exercise only strategic control. This is a great relief for those in charge (such as managers) who have enough time for other important tasks.
  • Dealing with changing environments: This type of structure is characterised by a high level of solvability in the face of any inconvenience that the environment may present. This is due to the creation of working teams to adapt to the changing needs of the surrounding environment.
  • Decentralization: In this organisation, authority is decentralised, with both top management and the lower levels of the structure participating in decision-making. Ideas and information are exchanged throughout the organisational structure, which makes for efficiency and fluidity.The decentralised system leads to a free flow of information among staff. Thanks to two-way communication channels, senior managers can provide guidance, information and direction to their subordinates, who in turn can provide their perspective to their superiors.

Disadvantages

As might be expected, this structure also has a number of drawbacks:

  • High administrative costs: This leads to high administrative costs, which reduce the turnover of the organisation. Furthermore, this structure is not feasible for organisations with limited funds.
  • Confusion and lack of coordination: In this model, many employees do not have a specific role within the organisation, which can lead to controversy and uncertainty. As it is a joint work, it is often not possible to carry out the chain successfully. If team members are not on the same page, it leads to a loss of efficiency that can affect the achievement of objectives.
  • Communication problems: Too much information can do more harm than good and lead to miscommunication if not checked in time. Sometimes a free exchange of views can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings that can cause problems in the organisation.

Footnotes

  1. Travica, B. (1999) p 4.
  2. Bhasin, H. (2020)
  3. Bhasin, H. (2020)

References

Author: Mónica Guijarro,Gabriela Valera,Zaira Bancells