Abatement cost: Difference between revisions
m (Infobox update) |
m (Text cleaning) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Abatement [[cost]]''' refers to the cost of reducing or eliminating pollution or other negative [[environmental]] impacts. This can include the cost of implementing new technologies or processes to reduce emissions, the cost of cleaning up existing pollution, and the cost of compliance with regulations. These costs can be significant for businesses and industries, and are often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Additionally, abatement costs can also include the cost of lost [[production]] or revenue as a result of implementing new regulations or technologies. | '''Abatement [[cost]]''' refers to the cost of reducing or eliminating pollution or other negative [[environmental]] impacts. This can include the cost of implementing new technologies or processes to reduce emissions, the cost of cleaning up existing pollution, and the cost of compliance with regulations. These costs can be significant for businesses and industries, and are often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Additionally, abatement costs can also include the cost of lost [[production]] or revenue as a result of implementing new regulations or technologies. | ||
Line 40: | Line 22: | ||
It's worth noting that, abatement cost calculations can be complex and depend on many factors such as the nature of pollution or environmental impacts, the technologies or processes available to reduce them, the size and scale of the operation, and the specific regulatory requirements. Consultation with experts in the field may be necessary to make accurate calculations. | It's worth noting that, abatement cost calculations can be complex and depend on many factors such as the nature of pollution or environmental impacts, the technologies or processes available to reduce them, the size and scale of the operation, and the specific regulatory requirements. Consultation with experts in the field may be necessary to make accurate calculations. | ||
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Differential costing]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Value added statement]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Economic feasibility]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Eco efficiency]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Incremental analysis]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Simulation scenarios]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Contribution to sales ratio]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Cost avoidance]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Activity-based management]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Badwill]]}} }} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 45: | Line 29: | ||
* Ekins, P., Kesicki, F., & Smith, A. Z. (2011). Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. London, UK: University College London. | * Ekins, P., Kesicki, F., & Smith, A. Z. (2011). Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. London, UK: University College London. | ||
* McKitrick, R. (1999). A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. Journal of Environmental [[Economics]] and Management, 37(3), 306-314. | * McKitrick, R. (1999). A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. Journal of Environmental [[Economics]] and Management, 37(3), 306-314. | ||
[[Category:Environmental management]] | [[Category:Environmental management]] |
Latest revision as of 16:06, 17 November 2023
Abatement cost refers to the cost of reducing or eliminating pollution or other negative environmental impacts. This can include the cost of implementing new technologies or processes to reduce emissions, the cost of cleaning up existing pollution, and the cost of compliance with regulations. These costs can be significant for businesses and industries, and are often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Additionally, abatement costs can also include the cost of lost production or revenue as a result of implementing new regulations or technologies.
How to use abatement cost?
Managers can use information about abatement costs to make informed decisions about how to reduce pollution or environmental impacts while also balancing the costs and benefits of different options. Here are a few examples of how managers can use information about abatement costs:
- Compliance with regulations: Managers can use information about abatement costs to determine the most cost-effective way to comply with environmental regulations. For example, if a regulation requires a certain reduction in emissions, a manager can use abatement cost information to determine the most cost-effective technology or process to achieve that reduction.
- Cost-benefit analysis: Managers can use information about abatement costs in combination with the value of the environmental benefits of the abatement measures to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. This will help them to determine if the benefits of a particular abatement measure outweigh the costs, and thus whether or not to implement it.
- Investment decisions: Managers can use information about abatement costs to make decisions about investing in new technologies or processes that will reduce pollution or environmental impacts. For example, if a new technology promises to significantly reduce emissions but is more expensive than the current technology, a manager can use abatement cost information to determine if the investment is worthwhile in the long run.
- Negotiations with stakeholders: Managers can also use information about abatement costs in negotiations with stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, and regulators. This information can help them to demonstrate the costs and benefits of different options and to make a more convincing case for their decisions.
- Continuous improvement: Abatement cost information can also be used in continuous improvement programs, by tracking and analyzing the costs and benefits over time, managers can identify areas where further improvements can be made and adjust their plans accordingly.
It's worth noting that, the use of abatement cost information is a critical aspect of sustainability management and it is important to consider not only the environmental and economic benefits but also the social and ethical implications of the decisions made.
Abatement cost calculation
There are several methods that can be used to calculate abatement costs, but they generally involve comparing the costs of implementing a new technology or process to reduce pollution or environmental impacts to the benefits of that reduction. The most commonly used method is the "difference in costs" method, which calculates the difference in costs between the current situation and the situation after the implementation of abatement measures.
One example of how to calculate abatement cost using the difference in costs method is as follows:
- Determine the current cost of producing a product or service, including the cost of any pollution or environmental impacts.
- Determine the cost of implementing new technologies or processes to reduce pollution or environmental impacts.
- Subtract the cost of the new technologies or processes from the current cost of production to find the difference in costs.
This difference in costs represents the abatement cost. Additionally, the value of the environmental benefits of the abatement measures can be quantified by methods such as monetization or benefit-cost analysis.
It's worth noting that, abatement cost calculations can be complex and depend on many factors such as the nature of pollution or environmental impacts, the technologies or processes available to reduce them, the size and scale of the operation, and the specific regulatory requirements. Consultation with experts in the field may be necessary to make accurate calculations.
Abatement cost — recommended articles |
Differential costing — Value added statement — Economic feasibility — Eco efficiency — Incremental analysis — Simulation scenarios — Contribution to sales ratio — Cost avoidance — Activity-based management — Badwill |
References
- Huang, S. K., Kuo, L., & Chou, K. L. (2016). The applicability of marginal abatement cost approach: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 59-71.
- Ekins, P., Kesicki, F., & Smith, A. Z. (2011). Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. London, UK: University College London.
- McKitrick, R. (1999). A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(3), 306-314.