Phantom Income: Difference between revisions
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
m (Infobox5 upgrade) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Phantom income''' ('''fictitious income''')- income that is apportioned to a partner that he must pay tax on but does not really receive in the form of ready cash ( J. Reuting, 2008 page 343). | '''Phantom income''' ('''fictitious income''')- income that is apportioned to a partner that he must pay tax on but does not really receive in the form of ready cash ( J. Reuting, 2008 page 343). | ||
If the operating agreement allows for it, the LLC's (limited liability [[company]]) managers can decline to distribute trading [[profit]]. The lender is even still required to pay '''income taxes''' on these profits as if they were received. This is phantom income and a way that a lot of seasoned LLC proprietors pass on their income tax burdens to their obligee instead of their cash (Jennifer Reuting, 2008 page 192). | If the operating agreement allows for it, the LLC's (limited liability [[company]]) managers can decline to distribute trading [[profit]]. The lender is even still required to pay '''income taxes''' on these profits as if they were received. This is phantom income and a way that a lot of seasoned LLC proprietors pass on their income tax burdens to their obligee instead of their cash (Jennifer Reuting, 2008 page 192). | ||
| Line 29: | Line 14: | ||
== Advantages and disadvantages== | == Advantages and disadvantages== | ||
There is bad and good side to '''phantom income'''. The bad side is that it can happen to you. On the other hand, you can foist it on a lender who gets a charging order on a member's [[interest]]. A charging order on a member is indictable personally, and it only gives a creditor access to the allocate profits to the trade creditors and do not give him any [[money]] to pay the taxes on those gains (J.Reuting 2008, page 240). | There is bad and good side to '''phantom income'''. The bad side is that it can happen to you. On the other hand, you can foist it on a lender who gets a charging order on a member's [[interest]]. A charging order on a member is indictable personally, and it only gives a creditor access to the allocate profits to the trade creditors and do not give him any [[money]] to pay the taxes on those gains (J.Reuting 2008, page 240). | ||
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Ownership interest]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Fixed and floating charge]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Rate base]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[In-kind distribution]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Grantor trust]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Cash earnings]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Trade exchange]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Shareholder loan]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Depreciation vs. amortization]]}} }} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 00:06, 18 November 2023
Phantom income (fictitious income)- income that is apportioned to a partner that he must pay tax on but does not really receive in the form of ready cash ( J. Reuting, 2008 page 343). If the operating agreement allows for it, the LLC's (limited liability company) managers can decline to distribute trading profit. The lender is even still required to pay income taxes on these profits as if they were received. This is phantom income and a way that a lot of seasoned LLC proprietors pass on their income tax burdens to their obligee instead of their cash (Jennifer Reuting, 2008 page 192).
Real and fictitious income
The ability to draw the distinction between "real" income and "fictitious" income is very important. Thus, "every real profit
- every evert shift
- increment in wealth or
- increase in property,
including unrealized capital yield" has to be treated differently from "fictitious earnings and fictitious capital increases". Income that has not been put at the disposal of the ratepayer or does not yet exist is merely fictional income. Phantom Income is non-existent from a civil-law point of view and has not led to a shift of value or assets. Nevertheless, income fictions are not the same as a method of calculating advantages that have been in fact received (M. J. Ellis 2005, page 23). According to some scientists, fictions are not about calculation, but about allocation: "It is up to the Contracting States to determine the money value of the income components allocated to them by the treaty. Such fictions are essentially not fictions, but lump-sum approximations of reality" (Wattel, Marres 2018, page 69).
Advantages and disadvantages
There is bad and good side to phantom income. The bad side is that it can happen to you. On the other hand, you can foist it on a lender who gets a charging order on a member's interest. A charging order on a member is indictable personally, and it only gives a creditor access to the allocate profits to the trade creditors and do not give him any money to pay the taxes on those gains (J.Reuting 2008, page 240).
| Phantom Income — recommended articles |
| Ownership interest — Fixed and floating charge — Rate base — In-kind distribution — Grantor trust — Cash earnings — Trade exchange — Shareholder loan — Depreciation vs. amortization |
References
- Ellis M.J. (2005), A Tax Globalist: The Search for the Borders of International Taxation : Essays in Honour of Maarten J. Ellis, IBFD, Amsterdam
- Kennedy D. (2010), Smart Business, Stupid Business: What School Never Taught You About Building a SUCCESSFUL Business, Morgan James Publishing, Garden City, NY
- Lasser Institute J. K. (2010), J.K. Lasser's Your Income Tax 2011: For Preparing Your 2010 Tax Return John Wiley & Sons, New York
- Reuting J. (2008), Limited Liability Companies For Dummies, John Wiley & Sons, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, Indiana
- United States. Department of the Treasury. Office of the Secretary (1984), Tax Reform for Fairness, Simplicity, and Economic Growth: Overview, Office of the Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Washington D.C.
- Wattel P.J., Marres O. (2018), European Tax Law Seventh Edition, Wolters Kluwer Law International
- Wellons H.B., Smith Ewing E., Copple R. (2007), Biotechnology and the Law, Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice, Chicago, Illinois
Author: Edyta Pach
