Marginal productivity theory of distribution: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
 
m (Text cleaning)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{infobox4
'''Marginal productivity theory of distribution''' is an microeconomic concept, which explains how [[work]] and capital are rewarded for their productivity. This theory is based on the existence of a perfectly competitive economy in which wages and [[interest]] rates are at a constant, uniform level<ref>Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 79-82,</ref>. It assumes the use of [[production]] factors (labor, land, capital) in unitary terms until the costs of these factors equal to the unit value of the marginal [[product]]. In other words, it sets the limit of profitability of production, in which the value of the marginal product is equal to the [[cost]] of production of this product<ref>Krugman P. & Wells R., (2017), p. 290-292,</ref>.
|list1=
<ul>
<li>[[Net rate]]</li>
<li>[[Arthur Cecil Pigou]]</li>
<li>[[Differential costing]]</li>
<li>[[Austrian theory of money]]</li>
<li>[[Effective demand]]</li>
<li>[[David Ricardo]]</li>
<li>[[Point elasticity]]</li>
<li>[[Indemnity principle]]</li>
<li>[[Neoclassical economics]]</li>
</ul>
}}
 
 
 
'''Marginal productivity theory of distribution''' is an microeconomic concept, which explains how [[work]] and capital are rewarded for their productivity. This theory is based on the existence of a perfectly competitive economy in which wages and interest rates are at a constant, uniform level<ref>Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 79-82,</ref>. It assumes the use of [[production]] factors (labor, land, capital) in unitary terms until the costs of these factors equal to the unit value of the marginal [[product]]. In other words, it sets the limit of profitability of production, in which the value of the marginal product is equal to the [[cost]] of production of this product<ref>Krugman P. & Wells R., (2017), p. 290-292,</ref>.


The marginal productivity theory of distribution is directly related to Clark's '''law of final productivity'''<ref>Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 81</ref>.
The marginal productivity theory of distribution is directly related to Clark's '''law of final productivity'''<ref>Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 81</ref>.
Line 23: Line 6:
The marginal productivity theory of distribution currently faces criticism from authors who pay attention to the following issues<ref>Pullen J., (2010),</ref>:
The marginal productivity theory of distribution currently faces criticism from authors who pay attention to the following issues<ref>Pullen J., (2010),</ref>:
* This theory does not explain in what part a given factor is assigned to a marginal product. For example "even if the marginal product that occurs after the [[employment]] of the last unit of labour is equal to almost nothing, that 'almost nothing' is not produced by the last unit of labour alone. If the last unit of labour receives a wage equal to the marginal product that occurs after the employment of the last unit of labour, the last unit of labour is receiving a reward for something it has not produced".
* This theory does not explain in what part a given factor is assigned to a marginal product. For example "even if the marginal product that occurs after the [[employment]] of the last unit of labour is equal to almost nothing, that 'almost nothing' is not produced by the last unit of labour alone. If the last unit of labour receives a wage equal to the marginal product that occurs after the employment of the last unit of labour, the last unit of labour is receiving a reward for something it has not produced".
* This theory indicates the [[need]] to divide capital between different production factors. However, there is no rule in the economic and accounting theory to divide this capital, which would be reasonable enough.
* This theory indicates the [[need]] to divide capital between different production factors. However, there is no rule in the economic and [[accounting theory]] to divide this capital, which would be reasonable enough.
* This theory assumes that changes within the production factors occur singly. This means that it considers cases where only one [[factor of production]] changes at the same time (ceteris paribus clause).  
* This theory assumes that changes within the production factors occur singly. This means that it considers cases where only one [[factor of production]] changes at the same time (ceteris paribus clause).  
* The theory of marginal productivity is now considered by many critics as devoid of normative grounds. Is called "ethical theory of distribution" because it bears traces of ideological and ethical assertions.
* The theory of marginal productivity is now considered by many critics as devoid of normative grounds. Is called "ethical theory of distribution" because it bears traces of ideological and ethical assertions.
Line 29: Line 12:
==Footnotes==
==Footnotes==
<references />
<references />
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[David Ricardo]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Marginal revenue productivity theory of wages]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Marginal private benefit]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Point elasticity]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Baumol model]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Rybczynski theorem]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Economic income]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Permanent employment]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Austrian theory of money]]}} }}


==References==
==References==
* Asimakopulos A., (2012), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=227yCAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Theories of Income Distribution''], Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston & Dordecht & Lancaster,
* Asimakopulos A., (2012), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=227yCAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Theories of Income Distribution''], Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston & Dordecht & Lancaster,
* Felipe J. & McCombie J. S. L., (2015), [https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b2ac/efbe226968d06550129f5ffc6ea6dd94ace0.pdf ''Can the Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution be Tested?''], "Review of Radical Political [[Economics]]", vol. 47, s. 274-291,
* Felipe J. & McCombie J. S. L., (2015), [https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b2ac/efbe226968d06550129f5ffc6ea6dd94ace0.pdf ''Can the Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution be Tested?''], "Review of Radical Political [[Economics]]", vol. 47, p. 274-291,
* Krugman P. & Wells R., (2017), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=jJpMDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA292&dq=Marginal+productivity+theory+of+distribution&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiN06e8tJrhAhWxw8QBHa59BiwQ6AEIRzAE#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Economics (International Edition)''], Palgrave Macmillan, New York,
* Krugman P. & Wells R., (2017), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=jJpMDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA292&dq=Marginal+productivity+theory+of+distribution&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiN06e8tJrhAhWxw8QBHa59BiwQ6AEIRzAE#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Economics (International Edition)''], Palgrave Macmillan, New York,
* Pullen J., (2010), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=9VF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=law+of+final+productivity+clark&source=bl&ots=ZtX6nKkwKX&sig=ACfU3U0uJhRThlarJJWi3Wbzu6FFczRmyg&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEzbvyi53hAhXdxcQBHXDZDsoQ6AEwAHoECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false ''The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution: A Critical History''], Routledge, London & New York,
* Pullen J., (2010), [https://books.google.pl/books?id=9VF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=law+of+final+productivity+clark&source=bl&ots=ZtX6nKkwKX&sig=ACfU3U0uJhRThlarJJWi3Wbzu6FFczRmyg&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEzbvyi53hAhXdxcQBHXDZDsoQ6AEwAHoECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false ''The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution: A Critical History''], Routledge, London & New York,

Latest revision as of 01:25, 18 November 2023

Marginal productivity theory of distribution is an microeconomic concept, which explains how work and capital are rewarded for their productivity. This theory is based on the existence of a perfectly competitive economy in which wages and interest rates are at a constant, uniform level[1]. It assumes the use of production factors (labor, land, capital) in unitary terms until the costs of these factors equal to the unit value of the marginal product. In other words, it sets the limit of profitability of production, in which the value of the marginal product is equal to the cost of production of this product[2].

The marginal productivity theory of distribution is directly related to Clark's law of final productivity[3].

Criticism of the marginal productivity theory of distribution

The marginal productivity theory of distribution currently faces criticism from authors who pay attention to the following issues[4]:

  • This theory does not explain in what part a given factor is assigned to a marginal product. For example "even if the marginal product that occurs after the employment of the last unit of labour is equal to almost nothing, that 'almost nothing' is not produced by the last unit of labour alone. If the last unit of labour receives a wage equal to the marginal product that occurs after the employment of the last unit of labour, the last unit of labour is receiving a reward for something it has not produced".
  • This theory indicates the need to divide capital between different production factors. However, there is no rule in the economic and accounting theory to divide this capital, which would be reasonable enough.
  • This theory assumes that changes within the production factors occur singly. This means that it considers cases where only one factor of production changes at the same time (ceteris paribus clause).
  • The theory of marginal productivity is now considered by many critics as devoid of normative grounds. Is called "ethical theory of distribution" because it bears traces of ideological and ethical assertions.

Footnotes

  1. Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 79-82,
  2. Krugman P. & Wells R., (2017), p. 290-292,
  3. Asimakopulos A, (2012), p. 81
  4. Pullen J., (2010),


Marginal productivity theory of distributionrecommended articles
David RicardoMarginal revenue productivity theory of wagesMarginal private benefitPoint elasticityBaumol modelRybczynski theoremEconomic incomePermanent employmentAustrian theory of money

References

Author: Wojciech Musiał