Minimax criterion: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
m (Infobox update)
Line 3: Line 3:
<ul>
<ul>
<li>[[Maximin criterion]]</li>
<li>[[Maximin criterion]]</li>
<li>[[Project evaluation methods]]</li>
<li>[[Expected utility theory]]</li>
<li>[[Differential costing]]</li>
<li>[[Conditions of decision-making]]</li>
<li>[[Markov model]]</li>
<li>[[Decision process models]]</li>
<li>[[Tornado diagram]]</li>
<li>[[Expected utility]]</li>
<li>[[Line balancing]]</li>
<li>[[Quantitative risk analysis]]</li>
<li>[[Book to market ratio]]</li>
<li>[[Allocated cost]]</li>
<li>[[Selection process in conditions of certainty and uncertainty]]</li>
<li>[[Selection process in conditions of certainty and uncertainty]]</li>
<li>[[Influence diagram]]</li>
<li>[[Analysis of preferences]]</li>
</ul>
</ul>
}}
}}


Min-max criterion - is a decision-making criterion presented in 1954 by Leonard Savage. This criterion minimizes the expected loss associated with making worse than optimal decision, for a given state of nature. In the decision-making [[process]] such [[strategy]] should be selected, for which the relative loss is the smallest.
Min-max criterion - is a decision-making criterion presented in 1954 by Leonard Savage. This criterion minimizes the expected loss associated with making worse than optimal decision, for a given state of nature. In the decision-making [[process]] such [[strategy]] should be selected, for which the relative loss is the smallest.

Revision as of 23:32, 19 March 2023

Minimax criterion
See also


Min-max criterion - is a decision-making criterion presented in 1954 by Leonard Savage. This criterion minimizes the expected loss associated with making worse than optimal decision, for a given state of nature. In the decision-making process such strategy should be selected, for which the relative loss is the smallest.

Application

Fig.1. Minimax criterion procedure (example)

According to the criterion you must first find a matrix of relative loss (a matrix of grief). Loss is defined as the difference between the greatest win, for a particular state of nature, and winning that corresponds to the predicted results of current decision. The calculations are made in columns in each of them going to the largest value, and then typed in the array of grief, the difference between the highest value and the currently calculated. This process can be expressed in following equation:

The next step is, specifying maximum loss for each strategy, and at the end selection of the strategy for which the maximum loss, will be the largest. Model:

Example

Example: we have an array of payments from the four possible decisions and three possible states:

I II III
T1 200 100 120
T2 0 300 −200
T3 0 300 500
T4 −100 200 0

On this basis cost matrix of relative loss is calculated. Each value in column is subtracted from max values in scenario I/II/III:

I II III
T1 0 200 380
T2 200 0 700
T3 200 0 0
T4 300 100 500

We are looking for the maximum losses for each strategy, and then select the smallest:

Strategies
T1 380
T2 700
T3 200
T4 500

Summing up: According to the Min-max manager should choose a strategy T3.

Advantages of Minimax criterion

The Minimax criterion has several advantages in decision-making. These include:

  • It helps to minimize the risk of making a wrong decision, as it helps to identify the best possible solution in the given state of nature.
  • It is simple and easy to understand and apply.
  • It is based on the concept of maximizing the minimum gain, which ensures that all possible outcomes are taken into account.
  • It is a robust decision-making criterion, as it is not affected by changes in the environment or the circumstances.
  • It is a cost-effective approach, as it does not require any additional resources to be used.

Limitations of Minimax criterion

The Minimax criterion has several limitations:

  • It assumes that all outcomes are known, which is rarely the case in real-world scenarios. Additionally, it ignores the uncertainty of the outcomes, which can make it difficult to accurately evaluate the risks associated with different decisions.
  • It only considers the worst-case scenario when evaluating the expected loss of different options, and does not consider other scenarios which might be more beneficial.
  • It does not take into account the preferences or values of the decision-maker, which can lead to suboptimal decisions.
  • It can be computationally complex, making it difficult to use in practice.

Other approaches related to Minimax criterion

Here is a list of other approaches related to Minimax criterion:

  • Maximin criterion - it is a decision-making criterion which is based on maximizing the expected minimum gain associated with making an optimal decision, for a given state of nature.
  • Hurwitz criterion - it is a decision-making criterion which takes into account both the expected gain and the expected loss. It is based on minimizing the maximum expected loss associated with making a sub-optimal decision, for a given state of nature.
  • Bayes criterion - it is a decision-making criterion which takes into account the prior probabilities when making decisions. It is based on minimizing the expected risk associated with making a sub-optimal decision, for a given state of nature.
  • Laplace criterion - it is a decision-making criterion which takes into account the prior probabilities as well as the expected gain and loss when making decisions. It is based on minimizing the expected risk associated with making a sub-optimal decision, for a given state of nature.

In summary, other approaches related to Minimax criterion are Maximin criterion, Hurwitz criterion, Bayes criterion, and Laplace criterion. Each of these approaches is based on minimizing the expected loss associated with making worse than optimal decisions, for a given state of nature.

References