New international economic order

New international economic order
See also
Open economy Trade liberalization Laissez faire government Reflation Government intervention Emerging market economy Currency Convertibility Global bank Innovative climate finance instruments

The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward during the 1970s by the Group of 77, a coalition of developing nations, for reforming the global economic system. The proposals sought to create a more equitable economic and financial system that would provide increased economic stability, security and prosperity in the developing world.

The main elements of the NIEO included:

• The right of all nations to exercise sovereignty over their natural resources: This would grant each nation the right to determine how their natural resources are used, and to receive a just and equitable share of the profits from their exploitation.
• The establishment of an international commodity agreement: This would involve the setting of minimum prices for commodities produced and exported by developing nations, as well as the guarantee of access to markets in developed countries.
• The establishment of an international monetary system: This would involve the creation of an international reserve currency, the elimination of exchange rate fluctuations, and the establishment of an international banking system.
• The establishment of a new international financial architecture: This would involve the reform of the international banking and financial system, with the goal of providing developing nations with access to credit and capital markets.
• The strengthening of the United Nations: This would involve the strengthening of the United Nations' role as an international arbiter and a promoter of economic development.

Overall, the NIEO proposals sought to create a more equitable global economic system that would provide increased stability, security and prosperity in the developing world.

Propositions of the NIEO

Specifically, the NIEO proposed:

• The right of all nations to exercise sovereignty over their natural resources, including the right to determine how their natural resources are used and to receive a just and equitable share of the profits from their exploitation.
• The establishment of an international commodity agreement, which would involve the setting of minimum prices for commodities produced and exported by developing nations, as well as the guarantee of access to markets in developed countries.
• The establishment of an international monetary system, which would involve the creation of an international reserve currency, the elimination of exchange rate fluctuations, and the establishment of an international banking system.
• The establishment of a new international financial architecture, which would involve the reform of the international banking and financial system, with the goal of providing developing nations with access to credit and capital markets.
• The strengthening of the United Nations, which would involve the strengthening of the United Nations' role as an international arbiter and a promoter of economic development.

These reforms proposed by the NIEO would create a more equitable global economic system and would provide increased stability, security and prosperity in the developing world.

Advantages of New international economic order

The New International Economic Order (NIEO) had several advantages that could potentially benefit the developing world. First, it would provide increased economic stability and security by creating a more equitable economic system. This would ensure that developing nations would receive a fair share of the profits from the exploitation of their natural resources and also have access to markets in developed countries. Secondly, it would create a new international financial architecture which would provide developing nations with access to credit and capital markets. Finally, it would strengthen the United Nations and its role as an international arbiter and promoter of economic development. Ultimately, the NIEO could bring much needed economic stability and prosperity to the developing world.

Limitations of New international economic order

One of the main limitations of the NIEO was its inability to address the root causes of poverty and inequality in the developing world. While the proposals sought to provide increased access to resources and markets, they did not address the underlying structural issues that lead to poverty and inequality. Additionally, the proposals did not adequately address the political and economic power disparities between developed and developing nations. As a result, the NIEO failed to achieve its objectives and its impact on the global economic system was limited.

Other approaches related to New international economic order

In addition to the NIEO proposals, there have been a number of other approaches that have been proposed to address the challenges of global economic inequality. These include:

• Trade liberalization: This involves the removal of barriers such as tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions on the international trade of goods and services.
• Debt relief: This involves the reduction or cancellation of debt owed by developing countries, often through the use of grants or loans from multilateral organizations such as the World Bank or International Monetary Fund.
• Structural adjustment programs: These involve the implementation of economic reforms, such as the liberalization of trade and capital markets, in order to create a more favorable environment for economic growth.
• Strategic investment: This involves the use of public funds to support the development of strategic industries in developing countries, such as agriculture, manufacturing, infrastructure, and energy.

Overall, these approaches seek to create a more equitable global economic system by reducing barriers to international trade and providing developing countries with access to capital and investment.

Suggested literature

• Lewis, W. A. (2015). The evolution of the international economic order. In The Evolution of the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.