Fully funded: Difference between revisions
m (Infobox5 upgrade) |
m (Text cleaning) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
{{a|Anna Zuwała}} | {{a|Anna Zuwała}} | ||
[[Category:Financial management]] | [[Category:Financial management]] |
Latest revision as of 21:49, 17 November 2023
Fully funded is a description of quality of pension plan. If the assets in the pension plan are enough to provide for all benefits accumulated by an employee, the plan is fully funded.
The plan depends on gathered capital as well as returns on investments. The annual benefits statement released by the company can help employees assess quality of their pension plan. If the plan is enough to cover benefits, it is fully funded.
Fully funded in education
The term fully funded can also refer to scholarship. Fully funded scholarship covers all the required costs as accommodation, insurance, food. The most known scholarships are:
- Fulbright scholarship (USA)
- CommonWealth scholarship (UK)
- Amsterdam Excellence scholarship (Netherlands)
- Public Service Commission (Singapore)
Fully funded in retirement plans
According to actuarial standards a lot of local and state institutions itends to strive for fully funding. Funding resources meansured by market values often change and are not sufficient. Rates of return on pension assets are lower than the costs of borrowing taken by taxpayers in a model where most taxpayers maintain debt and bear brokerage costs. That is why, optimal is zero pension funding. In addition, unpaided pension benefits are discounted accordingly at a rate strictly exceeding the government's loaning rate. Sometimes roblems with law enforcement mean that non-risked pensions are risky for employees. In this case, financing may still be in the interest of taxpayers. Except in special cases, the optimal financing ratio does not reach 100% [1].
Europe
The model of retirement benefit that falls between the first and second pension pillar is capital plans. Depending on the country, it belongs to the first or second pillar. The reason for the differences is that most premiums are for social insurance.
Obligatory funded pensions about a certain type of contributions was introduced after the fall of the Iron Curtain. Hungary was the first, in 1998, followed by Poland 1 year later. Eight out of eleven CEE countries have introduced such a mandatory pillar.
Recently, this pension project introduced by Slovakia (in 2005) and Romania (in 2007). Only the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Lithuania remain the exceptions.
An important difference between financial systems in Europe is the choice of investment. Pension funds with different risk profiles can or must offer in Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia. In other CEE countries, only one can be offered [2].
Fully funded — recommended articles |
Non-expiring expenses — Finance company — Bond Bank — Income Shifting — Borrowing capacity — Applicable federal rate — Bridge Bank — Sovereign guarantee — External sources of finance |
References
- Börsch A. (2009). Many roads to Rome: Varieties of funded pensions in Europe and Asia International Journal, issue 3, vol. 14, 172-180.
- Feldstein, M. (1997). Transition to a fully funded pension system: five economic issues (No. w6149). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Henning B. (2011). Should public retirement plans be fully funded? Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, issue 2, vol. 10
- Pollard P.S., Pecchenino R.A. (1998). The Transition from a Pay-As-You-Go to a Fully-Funded Social Security System: Is There a Role for Social Insurance? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
- Rofman R., Ourens L.L.G. (2010). Pension Systems in Latin America: Concepts and Measurements of Coverage Departamento de Economia
Footnotes
Author: Anna Zuwała