Feasibility analysis

From CEOpedia | Management online
Revision as of 21:23, 17 November 2023 by Sw (talk | contribs) (Text cleaning)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Feasibility analysis is an analysis of a project which supports process of decision-making by scrutinous examination of its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, while also providing information about necessary resources and chances to succeed [1].

Feasibility analysis is not a strict methodology and is not normative. Rather, it is a broad term describing actions to evaluate at the early stages of planning, whether project should proceed, be redesign or else abandoned [2].

Vulnerability of a project

To assess feasibility of a project, it is important to find likelihood of its failure.

Vulnerability is "condition experienced by any of the four Ps (Plan, Processes, People, Power) of a project that make it susceptible to failure"[3].

Potentially harmful factors in projects are called Points of Vulnerability (POV): "temporal and physical points along the various stages of a project that impede on the calendar, costs, and/or quality of the project as it faces adverse conditions (negative forces), whether these conditions are under human control or not" [4].

As definitions above imply, projects are subjects to influence of internal and external POVs.

Areas of feasibility

Feasibility analysis of every project is different due to differences between industries, environments, settings, project-scales, constraints and other factors.

TELOS acronym has been created to help to identify key areas of any project's feasibility [5][6]:

  • T - Technical (also Technological) - whether or not the project is technically/technologically possible
  • E - Economic - affordability, costs and profitability of project
  • L - Legal - is the project compliant to laws and regulations
  • O - Operational (also Organizational) - is project adhering to organization's needs and whether or not needed resources are available
  • S - Scheduling - expectations on deadlines and ability to meet them

Feasibility analysis vs. cost-benefit analysis

Even though feasibility analysis is widely regarded and used tool, it should be used with precaution, especially when project's marginal benefits exceed marginal costs. There are other types of analysis which assess project strength and weaknesses, of which cost-benefit analysis is most popular.

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) calculates project's value simply by using monetary terms of costs and benefits to provide their net present value. Compared to feasibility analysis, CBA is much more straightforward.

Taking example of feasibility analysis for regulations of increasing workspace safety, feasibility analysis can lead to suboptimal (economically) results. These results can be divided into: underregulation and overregulation.

Underregulation is possible where:

  • cheap precaution technology can be developed, but does not yet exits,
  • revenues in industry are low and do not scale well with revenue,
  • low profits of industry do not allow effective regulations.

Overregulation on the other hand can occur if:

  • feasible regulation costs exceed benefits from risk reduction,
  • industry has high revenues or high profits, or precaution costs increase heavily with revenue.

In these cases, cost-benefit analysis is better, as it is much cheaper, faster and gives results easier to evaluate[7].

Examples of Feasibility analysis

  1. Cost-Benefit Analysis: This involves identifying the costs associated with a project, such as the cost of labor, materials, and equipment, and then comparing those costs to the expected benefits of the project.
  2. Market Analysis: This involves researching the market to gain an understanding of the customer and competitor landscape. It can help determine if there is a need for a product or service and if so, what the potential is for success.
  3. Technical Analysis: This involves researching the technical requirements of a project, such as the software and hardware needed, to ensure that the project is feasible from a technical standpoint.
  4. Organizational Analysis: This involves evaluating the organizational structure and processes in place to ensure that the project can be supported and managed effectively.
  5. Risk Analysis: This involves assessing the risks associated with a project and evaluating how those risks can be managed. This helps identify potential problems before they arise.

Limitations of Feasibility analysis

Feasibility analysis is an essential tool for the decision-making process; however, it has some limitations. These include:

  • It is based on assumptions and estimates, and therefore can be inaccurate if the estimations are wrong.
  • It does not take into account the political, social, and regulatory environment in which the project is being carried out, meaning that the feasibility analysis may not account for unexpected developments.
  • It does not consider the potential risks and rewards of the project, which may be overlooked in the analysis.
  • It may not be able to accurately assess the cost of the project, as it is difficult to estimate the cost of resources and labor.
  • It may be unable to accurately assess the impact of the project on its surrounding environment.
  • It is difficult to measure the value of intangible elements of the project, such as customer loyalty or brand recognition.

Other approaches related to Feasibility analysis

Feasibility analysis is a process that provides information to support decision-making. Here are some other approaches related to feasibility analysis:

  • Cost-benefit Analysis: This is an analysis of the costs and benefits associated with a project, in order to determine its feasibility. It is often used to measure the worth of a project in financial terms, and to determine whether it will be profitable for an organization.
  • Risk Analysis: This is an analysis of potential risks associated with a project. It is used to identify and mitigate risks, and to weigh the potential costs and benefits of the project.
  • Analysis of Alternatives: This is an analysis of different possible solutions to a problem, in order to determine which one is the most feasible. It is used to identify the most effective and efficient solution to a problem, and to determine its feasibility.
  • Stakeholder Analysis: This is an analysis of the stakeholders involved in a project, in order to determine their interests, needs, and expectations. It is used to identify potential conflicts between stakeholders, and to determine the feasibility of the project.

In conclusion, feasibility analysis is a process that provides information to support decision-making, and there are several approaches related to it, such as cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis, analysis of alternatives, and stakeholder analysis.


Feasibility analysisrecommended articles
Scenarios of possible eventsSPACE methodRisk evaluationFunctions of portfolioInternal analysisASTRA analysisMaintenance strategyTechnological portfolioProject feasibility study

References

Footnotes

  1. Commission Regulation... 2014, p. 25
  2. Mesly O. 2017, p. 130
  3. Mesly O. 2017, p. 2
  4. Mesly O. 2017, p. 2
  5. Hall J. 2010, p. 188
  6. Šerman B., et al. 2017, p. 91-96
  7. Masur J., Posner E. A. 2010, p. 697-698

Author: Karolina Próchniak