Standards code: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
m (→‎References: typos fixed: New Zeland → New Zealand)
 
m (Text cleaning)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{infobox4
'''Standards code''' also known as '''Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade''' (as revised draft from 1971) or '''Tokyo Round Standards Code''' (1979) <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>was document created to avoid discriminations and manipulations in:
|list1=
<ul>
<li>[[Conditions of sale]]</li>
<li>[[Approved code of practice]]</li>
<li>[[Regulatory data]]</li>
<li>[[Certificate of free sale]]</li>
<li>[[Notice of arrival]]</li>
<li>[[Ultimate consignee]]</li>
<li>[[Funding agency]]</li>
<li>[[Standard]]</li>
<li>[[Workplace safety]]</li>
</ul>
}}
 
 
 
'''Standards code''' also known as '''''Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade''''' (as revised draft from 1971) or '''''Tokyo Round Standards Code''''' (1979) <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>was document created to avoid discriminations and manipulations in:
* preparing '''standards''' of products,
* preparing '''standards''' of products,
* '''testing''' of products,  
* '''testing''' of products,  
* '''certificating''' products via systems.
* '''certificating''' products via systems.
Another goal of the document was to encourage organisations in using '''open procedures''' of adopting the standards (for example United States the Administrative Procedure Act) and encourage them in harmonising '''international standards'''. [[Standard]] code document also established international procedures to secure organisations and support them is solving any '''complains'''<ref> United States Office of the Federal Register, National Archives, (1979), p. 1938</ref>. The ''international standards'' was not officially defined, neither the whole document approved, however its establishments are part of international standards <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>.
Another goal of the document was to encourage organisations in using '''open procedures''' of adopting the standards (for example United States the Administrative Procedure Act) and encourage them in harmonising '''international standards'''. [[Standard]] code document also established international procedures to secure organisations and support them is solving any '''complains'''<ref> United States Office of the Federal Register, National Archives, (1979), p. 1938</ref>. The ''international standards'' was not officially defined, neither the whole document approved, however its establishments are part of international standards <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>.


== Recommendations how to prepare documentation in compliance with Standards code ==
==Recommendations how to prepare documentation in compliance with Standards code==
Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade defined how harmonised, international documents should be prepared <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>:
Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade defined how harmonised, international documents should be prepared <ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 </ref>:
* layout of the harmonising document in each country may differ,
* layout of the harmonising document in each country may differ,
Line 28: Line 11:
* document is prepared by international organisations (governmental or non-governmental).  
* document is prepared by international organisations (governmental or non-governmental).  


== Uruguay Round Negotiations ==
==Uruguay Round Negotiations==
During Uruguay Round Negotiations the form of the '''''Tokyo Round Standards Code'''''  was updated with '''''Technical barriers to trade agreement'''''(in 1995) and defined three levels of international standards<ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46 - 48, 140 </ref>:
During Uruguay Round Negotiations the form of the '''Tokyo Round Standards Code''' was updated with '''Technical [[barriers to trade]] agreement'''(in 1995) and defined three levels of international standards<ref> Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46-48, 140 </ref>:
# '''Technical regulations''' for example fundamental geographical or climatic factors, technological issues, health conditions and risks,
# '''Technical regulations''' for example fundamental geographical or climatic factors, technological issues, health conditions and risks,
# Standards of '''the Code of Good Practise''' with international recommendations, guides and standards,
# Standards of '''the Code of Good Practise''' with international recommendations, guides and standards,
# '''Conformity assessment procedures''' supporting non- discrimination practices for example in assessment of suppliers,
# '''Conformity assessment procedures''' supporting non - discrimination practices for example in assessment of suppliers,


{{a|Jolanta Lesnicka}}
{{a|Jolanta Lesnicka}}
Line 40: Line 23:
<references />
<references />


== References ==
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Convention concerning International Carriage by Road]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Standard]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Customs house]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Accreditation]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Barriers to trade]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Certificate of origin]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Approved code of practice]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[International Organization for Standardization]]}} &mdash; {{i5link|a=[[Conditions of sale]]}} }}
* Carney D., (2017), [http://orca.cf.ac.uk/105913/1/Up%20to%20standard_A%20critique%20of%20IPSO%3Fs%20Editors%3F%20Code%20of%20Practice%20and%20IMPRESS%3F%20Standards%20Code%20%28Part%201%29.pdf ''Up to standard? A critique of IPSO's Editors' Code of Practice and IMPRESS'Standards Code–Part I''] in ''Communications Law, 22(3), 77-88''
 
==References==
* Carney D., (2017), [http://orca.cf.ac.uk/105913/1/Up%20to%20standard_A%20critique%20of%20IPSO%3Fs%20Editors%3F%20Code%20of%20Practice%20and%20IMPRESS%3F%20Standards%20Code%20%28Part%201%29.pdf ''Up to standard? A critique of IPSO's Editors' Code of Practice and IMPRESS'Standards Code-Part I''] in ''Communications Law, 22(3), 77-88''
* [[Education]] Council, (2017), [https://teachingcouncil.nz/sites/default/files/FAQ%20FINAL.pdf ''Our code, our standards. Frequently asked questions''], Education Council, New Zealand
* [[Education]] Council, (2017), [https://teachingcouncil.nz/sites/default/files/FAQ%20FINAL.pdf ''Our code, our standards. Frequently asked questions''], Education Council, New Zealand
* Gonzalez A., Hauenstein H., Ghikar G., Eilert P., (2014), [https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt70k5q5sz/qt70k5q5sz.pdf ''Unlocking the Smart Grid through Building Codes and Communication Standards: Code Opportunities to Increase DR Transactions''] presented at ACEEE Summer Study on Energy [[Efficiency]] in Buildings, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
* Gonzalez A., Hauenstein H., Ghikar G., Eilert P., (2014), [https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt70k5q5sz/qt70k5q5sz.pdf ''Unlocking the Smart Grid through Building Codes and Communication Standards: Code Opportunities to Increase DR Transactions''] presented at ACEEE Summer Study on Energy [[Efficiency]] in Buildings, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Latest revision as of 05:58, 18 November 2023

Standards code also known as Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade (as revised draft from 1971) or Tokyo Round Standards Code (1979) [1]was document created to avoid discriminations and manipulations in:

  • preparing standards of products,
  • testing of products,
  • certificating products via systems.

Another goal of the document was to encourage organisations in using open procedures of adopting the standards (for example United States the Administrative Procedure Act) and encourage them in harmonising international standards. Standard code document also established international procedures to secure organisations and support them is solving any complains[2]. The international standards was not officially defined, neither the whole document approved, however its establishments are part of international standards [3].

Recommendations how to prepare documentation in compliance with Standards code

Code of Conduct for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade defined how harmonised, international documents should be prepared [4]:

  • layout of the harmonising document in each country may differ,
  • format of the harmonising document in each country may differ,
  • document is prepared by international organisations (governmental or non-governmental).

Uruguay Round Negotiations

During Uruguay Round Negotiations the form of the Tokyo Round Standards Code was updated with Technical barriers to trade agreement(in 1995) and defined three levels of international standards[5]:

  1. Technical regulations for example fundamental geographical or climatic factors, technological issues, health conditions and risks,
  2. Standards of the Code of Good Practise with international recommendations, guides and standards,
  3. Conformity assessment procedures supporting non - discrimination practices for example in assessment of suppliers,

Author: Jolanta Lesnicka

Footnotes

  1. Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46
  2. United States Office of the Federal Register, National Archives, (1979), p. 1938
  3. Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46
  4. Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46
  5. Schroder H. Z., (2011), p. 46-48, 140


Standards coderecommended articles
Convention concerning International Carriage by RoadStandardCustoms houseAccreditationBarriers to tradeCertificate of originApproved code of practiceInternational Organization for StandardizationConditions of sale

References