Agroforestry: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
No edit summary
m (Text cleaning)
 
(95 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Agroforestry Analysis==
''' Agroforestry''' is a collaborative name for land - use systems and technologies where woody perennials( trees, shrubs, triumphs, bamboos,etc.) are designedly used on the same land - operation units as agrarian crops and/ or creatures, in some form of spatial arrangement or temporal sequence. The ecological and profitable sustainability of the agrarian and forestry systems of numerous countries, advanced and not, is explosively hovered by the adding preface of fantastic factory pests. This composition offers an examination of the main causes behind similar irruptions. Some important diseases induced by non-native phytopathogens are reported, the arrival of which in the last century had a disastrous impact on the [[environment]] and the economy of vast rural areas of our country. There are also reports of some formidable emerging pathogens, which are literally devastating entire territories in various parts of the planet, with serious damage to agricultural [[production]], the landscape, the economy and local [[tourism]]. Biological invasions, as mentioned above, are natural events. However, they have increased so frequently in recent times that they are now considered real emergencies. At the root of these calamities there are two conjunctures in the past not foreseeable, and in any case not easily governable: the climate changes on a planetary scale; and the social, economic and political changes that occurred in modern society. The ongoing global warming of the planet, caused by the massive release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, is leading to a [[globalization]] of climate.
The consequences are multiple:
# homogenization of biomes;
# breaking of those biogeographic barriers that in the course of evolution have allowed a separate evolution of flora and fauna (including, of course, microflora and entomofauna) on Earth;
# loss of current biodiversity. In our latitudes the phenomenon involves an increase in average temperatures and an alteration in the regime of annual rainfall. Such variations, in addition to causing physiological stress to the plants, also significantly alter the life cycles of plant parasites. Raising the winter minimum increases its survival rate. The propagation cycles and the reproduction rate are increased respectively in frequency and intensity. This means high biomass released into the environment, therefore strong inoculum pressure, therefore greater possibility of dispersion. Therefore, it is more likely that introduced agents will settle in new areas previously unsuitable for their biological [[needs]] (Marsden, Cortet,2019, p.37).


Agroforestry is a collective name for land-use systems and technologies where woody perennials (trees, shrubs, palms, bamboos, etc.) are deliberately used on the same land-management units as agricultural crops and/or animals, in some form of spatial arrangement or temporal sequence.
==The transformation of society==
The ecological and profitable sustainability of the agrarian and forestry systems of numerous countries, advanced and not, is explosively hovered by the adding preface of fantastic factory pests. This composition offers an examination of the main causes behind similar irruptions. Some important conditions convinced Beynon-native phytopathogens are reported, the appearance of which in the last century had a disastrous impact on the terrain and the frugality of vast pastoral areas of our country. There are also reports of some redoubtable arising pathogens, which are literally ruinous entire homes in colourful corridor of the earth, with serious damage to agrarian product, the geography, the frugality and original tourism. Biological irruptions, as mentioned over, are natural events. still, they've increased so constantly in recent times that they're now considered real extremities. At the root of these disasters there are two crunches in the history not foreseeable, and in any case not fluently governable the climate changes on a planetary scale (Global change); and the social, profitable and political changes that passed in ultramodern society. The ongoing global warming of the earth, caused by the massive release of hothouse feasts (CO2) into the atmosphere, is leading to a" globalization" of climate. 
The consequences are multiple homogenization of biomes; breaking of those biogeographic walls that in the course of elaboration have allowed a separate elaboration of foliage and fauna (including, of course, microflora and entomofauna) on Earth; loss of current biodiversity. In our authorizations the miracle involves an increase in average temperatures and an revision in the governance of periodic downfall. Similar variations, in addition to causing physiological stress to the shops, also significantly alter the life cycles of factory spongers. Raising the downtime minimum increases its survival rate. The propagation cycles and the reduplication rate are increased independently in frequency and intensity. This means high biomass released into the terrain, thus strong inoculum pressure, thus lesser possibility of dissipation. thus, it's more likely that introduced agents will settle in new areas preliminarily infelicitous for their natural requirements. 
The metamorphosis of society, on the other hand, with the dizzying increase in transport, trade, tourism, and thus the general mobility of men, goods and goods, has made the problem exponentially grow. transnational trade in seeds, slices, seedlings, timber, vegetables for consumption, etc., offers those unwanted" hitchers" who are phytopathogenic agents more and more openings to transfer to new homes. 
But all the conduct of anthropic disturbance to natural systems (road construction, power lines, structures, crop transformations, deforestation, etc.) promote natural irruptions. Everything that we call maybe inaptly" progress" changes the structure of ecosystems, communities, populations, relations between species, induces the release of coffers, alters the substrates and the physical terrain. 
Timbers, civic and per urban green, cultivated green, and that mound of natural and anthropic rudiments that form the so- called" mongrel geography" in which rudiments of the country (forestland, walls, fields, dikes, rows, etc.) combine with civic and productive agreements, and with the results of the metamorphoses of a literal and social nature (abandonment of the country, intensification of agrarian systems, urbanization, etc.), they bear the egregious signs. 
The changes to the pastoral terrain by fantastic spongers are repeated, on the other hand, since biblical times, occasionally accompanied by profitable heads, hunger, shortage, mass emigration. It suffices to recall the desolation of the wheat fields, in the classical period, by the agent of rust or, in more recent times, starting from 1870, the destruction of the coffee colonies by rust Hemileia Vastatrix.
The transformation of society, on the other hand, with the dizzying increase in [[transport]], trade, tourism, and therefore the general mobility of men, goods and commodities, has made the problem exponentially grow. International trade in seeds, cuttings, seedlings, timber, vegetables for consumption, etc., offers those unwanted hitchhikers who are phytopathogenic agents more and more opportunities to transfer to new territories.  
But all the actions of anthropic disturbance to natural systems (road construction, power lines, buildings, crop conversions, deforestation, etc.) promote biological invasions. Everything that we call perhaps improperly progress changes the structure of ecosystems, communities, populations, interactions between species, induces the release of resources, alters the substrates and the physical environment.  
'''Forests, urban and per urban green''', cultivated green, and that heap of natural and anthropic elements that form the so-called hybrid landscape in which elements of the countryside (woods, hedges, fields, ditches, rows, etc.) merge with urban and productive settlements, and with the results of the transformations of a historical and social nature (abandonment of the countryside, intensification of agricultural systems, urbanization, etc.), they bear the obvious signs.
The changes to the rural environment by exotic parasites are repeated, on the other hand, since biblical times, sometimes accompanied by economic crises, hunger, famine, mass emigration. It suffices to recall the devastation of the wheat fields, in the classical era, by the agent of rust or, in more recent times, starting from 1870, the destruction of the coffee plantations by rust hemileia vastatrix (Rosati, Burgess, 2018, p.806).


==The ecological, economic and landscape damage==
==The ecological,economic and landscape damage==
In our country the ecological, profitable and geography damage deduced to the agroforestry terrain by the accidental preface of fantastic pests is well comprehendible on the home. The appearance, around the twenties of the last century, of the agent of the graphitises of the Elm has led nearly to the exposure of this species from metropolises and country. A tree, symbol of pastoral areas, formerly abundant in walls, in rows, at the edges of the thoroughfares, in crossroads, in places, solitary guardian of churches and monuments, has been in the space of about a century reduced by the backcountry complaint. In fact, it's now infrequently present in adult samples, whilst it's more constantly set up in bushy form as it shows, in juvenile phase, a however deciduous resistance to the gryphosis. 
Some decades latterly, around 1940, the Chestnut cancer agent Cryphonectria parasitica appeared in epidemic form in our groaner groves, ruinous cedars and fruit shops. The spread of cancer modified the vegetation belt of the Castanetum favouring other species (for illustration, the lemon oak), thus altering in part the hilly geography. Among other effects, he brought to its knees a thriving groaner- growing, also important source of food, as well as profitable, for the pastoral populations of numerous underprivileged areas. 
'''In our country the ecological, economic and landscape damage''' derived to the agroforestry environment by the accidental introduction of exotic pests is well legible on the territory. The arrival, around the twenties of the last century, of the agent of the graphitosis of the Elm has led almost to the disappearance of this species from cities and countryside. A tree, symbol of rural areas, once abundant in hedges, in rows, at the edges of the streets, in crossroads, in squares, solitary guardian of churches and monuments, has been in the space of about a century reduced by the bush disease. In fact, it is now rarely present in adult specimens, whilst it is more frequently found in bushy form as it shows, in juvenile phase, a though ephemeral resistance to the graphiosis.
The styles of analysis and monitoring of the spatial structure of the agroforestry geography are now multitudinous and consolidated; still, only lately the results of these studies have begun to support and guide spatial planning programs for the expression of spatial development strategies discerned in relation to the requirements of niche conservation and biodiversity and geography conservation calibrated according to the particularity of individual homes. In particular, the theme of ecological networks has come a specific object of planning within the wide area tools. 
Some decades later, around 1940, the Chestnut cancer agent cryphonectria parasitica appeared in epidemic form in our chestnut groves, devastating cedars and fruit plants. The spread of cancer modified the vegetation belt of the castanetum favoring other species (for example, the turkey oak), therefore altering in part the hilly landscape. Among other things, he brought to its knees a thriving chestnut-growing, then important source of food, as well as economic, for the rural populations of many disadvantaged areas.
The methods of analysis and monitoring of the spatial structure of the agroforestry landscape are now numerous and consolidated; however, only recently the results of these studies have begun to support and guide spatial [[planning]] policies for the formulation of spatial development strategies differentiated in relation to the needs of habitat conservation and biodiversity and landscape conservation calibrated according to the specificities of individual territories. In particular, the theme of ecological networks has become a specific object of planning within the wide area tools (Mercer, 2004, p.316).
[[Category:Branches of the economy]]


[https://ceopedia.org/index.php/Agroforestry]
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Industrial waste]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Environmental problem]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Maritime transport]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Kyoto convention]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Homogenization of culture]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Global interdependence]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Sea freight]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Renewable resources]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[International division of labor]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Silo mentality]]}} }}


1)ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE USE OF LABOUR AND MACHINERY IN THE AGRO-FORESTRY SECTOR
==References==
BLANC, SIMONE 2010 [https://iris.unito.it/handle/2318/1526234]
* Marsden C., Cortet J., (2019), [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-019-04322-4.pdf ''How agroforestry systems influence soil fauna and their functions''] Plant Soil, 29-44
 
* Mercer D., (2004), [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029007.85754.70.pdf ''Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics''] Agroforestry Systems, 311-328
2) A. BARBATI  - G. CHIRICI SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND AGRO-FORESTRY LANDSCAPE PLANNING: PROSPECTS FOR INTEGRATION [https://dspace.unitus.it/bitstream/2067/2166/1/Atti%20III%20ConvSelvicotura.pdf]
* Rosati A., Burgess P., (2018), [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-018-0261-3.pdf ''Advances in European agroforestry''] Agroforest Syst, 801-810
 
3) The agro-forestry system of the regional space. Territorial guidelines on agricultural and forestry areas (vol. i, Agricultural activities in the regional economy and space, pp. 298; vol. II/1, II/2, Land use and economic development in the regional agro-forestry system, pp. 343 + 788; vol. III, The rural density areas for the government of the regional agro-forestry system, pp. 343).
PAOLILLO, PIER LUIGI; [https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/505843]
[[Category:Agroforestry]]
{{a|Chiara Di Miscio}}
{{a|Chiara Di Miscio}}

Latest revision as of 16:34, 17 November 2023

Agroforestry is a collaborative name for land - use systems and technologies where woody perennials( trees, shrubs, triumphs, bamboos,etc.) are designedly used on the same land - operation units as agrarian crops and/ or creatures, in some form of spatial arrangement or temporal sequence. The ecological and profitable sustainability of the agrarian and forestry systems of numerous countries, advanced and not, is explosively hovered by the adding preface of fantastic factory pests. This composition offers an examination of the main causes behind similar irruptions. Some important diseases induced by non-native phytopathogens are reported, the arrival of which in the last century had a disastrous impact on the environment and the economy of vast rural areas of our country. There are also reports of some formidable emerging pathogens, which are literally devastating entire territories in various parts of the planet, with serious damage to agricultural production, the landscape, the economy and local tourism. Biological invasions, as mentioned above, are natural events. However, they have increased so frequently in recent times that they are now considered real emergencies. At the root of these calamities there are two conjunctures in the past not foreseeable, and in any case not easily governable: the climate changes on a planetary scale; and the social, economic and political changes that occurred in modern society. The ongoing global warming of the planet, caused by the massive release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, is leading to a globalization of climate. The consequences are multiple:

  1. homogenization of biomes;
  2. breaking of those biogeographic barriers that in the course of evolution have allowed a separate evolution of flora and fauna (including, of course, microflora and entomofauna) on Earth;
  3. loss of current biodiversity. In our latitudes the phenomenon involves an increase in average temperatures and an alteration in the regime of annual rainfall. Such variations, in addition to causing physiological stress to the plants, also significantly alter the life cycles of plant parasites. Raising the winter minimum increases its survival rate. The propagation cycles and the reproduction rate are increased respectively in frequency and intensity. This means high biomass released into the environment, therefore strong inoculum pressure, therefore greater possibility of dispersion. Therefore, it is more likely that introduced agents will settle in new areas previously unsuitable for their biological needs (Marsden, Cortet,2019, p.37).

The transformation of society

The transformation of society, on the other hand, with the dizzying increase in transport, trade, tourism, and therefore the general mobility of men, goods and commodities, has made the problem exponentially grow. International trade in seeds, cuttings, seedlings, timber, vegetables for consumption, etc., offers those unwanted hitchhikers who are phytopathogenic agents more and more opportunities to transfer to new territories. But all the actions of anthropic disturbance to natural systems (road construction, power lines, buildings, crop conversions, deforestation, etc.) promote biological invasions. Everything that we call perhaps improperly progress changes the structure of ecosystems, communities, populations, interactions between species, induces the release of resources, alters the substrates and the physical environment. Forests, urban and per urban green, cultivated green, and that heap of natural and anthropic elements that form the so-called hybrid landscape in which elements of the countryside (woods, hedges, fields, ditches, rows, etc.) merge with urban and productive settlements, and with the results of the transformations of a historical and social nature (abandonment of the countryside, intensification of agricultural systems, urbanization, etc.), they bear the obvious signs. The changes to the rural environment by exotic parasites are repeated, on the other hand, since biblical times, sometimes accompanied by economic crises, hunger, famine, mass emigration. It suffices to recall the devastation of the wheat fields, in the classical era, by the agent of rust or, in more recent times, starting from 1870, the destruction of the coffee plantations by rust hemileia vastatrix (Rosati, Burgess, 2018, p.806).

The ecological,economic and landscape damage

In our country the ecological, economic and landscape damage derived to the agroforestry environment by the accidental introduction of exotic pests is well legible on the territory. The arrival, around the twenties of the last century, of the agent of the graphitosis of the Elm has led almost to the disappearance of this species from cities and countryside. A tree, symbol of rural areas, once abundant in hedges, in rows, at the edges of the streets, in crossroads, in squares, solitary guardian of churches and monuments, has been in the space of about a century reduced by the bush disease. In fact, it is now rarely present in adult specimens, whilst it is more frequently found in bushy form as it shows, in juvenile phase, a though ephemeral resistance to the graphiosis. Some decades later, around 1940, the Chestnut cancer agent cryphonectria parasitica appeared in epidemic form in our chestnut groves, devastating cedars and fruit plants. The spread of cancer modified the vegetation belt of the castanetum favoring other species (for example, the turkey oak), therefore altering in part the hilly landscape. Among other things, he brought to its knees a thriving chestnut-growing, then important source of food, as well as economic, for the rural populations of many disadvantaged areas. The methods of analysis and monitoring of the spatial structure of the agroforestry landscape are now numerous and consolidated; however, only recently the results of these studies have begun to support and guide spatial planning policies for the formulation of spatial development strategies differentiated in relation to the needs of habitat conservation and biodiversity and landscape conservation calibrated according to the specificities of individual territories. In particular, the theme of ecological networks has become a specific object of planning within the wide area tools (Mercer, 2004, p.316).


Agroforestryrecommended articles
Industrial wasteEnvironmental problemMaritime transportKyoto conventionHomogenization of cultureGlobal interdependenceSea freightRenewable resourcesInternational division of laborSilo mentality

References

Author: Chiara Di Miscio