Statute barred debt: Difference between revisions

From CEOpedia | Management online
m (Infobox5 upgrade)
m (Text cleaning)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Statute barred debt''' is a civil law institution where, after a certain period of time, a debtor may evade performance unless he waives the objection of limitation (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.1).
'''Statute barred debt''' is a civil law institution where, after a certain period of time, a debtor may evade performance unless he waives the objection of limitation (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.1).


The statute barred debt is a category linked to the passage of time. It occurs in civil law, financial law, administrative law, criminal law and other branches of material law. The statute of limitations is based on the fact that a debtor, after the lapse of the time limit specified by the law, may evade the performance of the [[service]] for the institution of the statute barred debt, the justification is primarily the impact of the passage of time (negative) on evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2).  
The statute barred debt is a category linked to the passage of time. It occurs in civil law, financial law, administrative law, criminal law and other branches of material law. The statute of limitations is based on the fact that a debtor, after the lapse of the time limit specified by the law, may evade the performance of the [[service]] for the institution of the statute barred debt, the justification is primarily the impact of the passage of time (negative) on evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2).  


The category is time related, because after years of evidence cannot be even carried out due to e.g. death of witnesses, destruction or disappearance of documents, etc. The reason for this is the (negative) effect of the passage of time on the evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims. It is also important that the statute barred debt has a mobilising effect on the creditor - he is urged to pursue his claims very quickly (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2-5).
The category is time related, because after years of evidence cannot be even carried out due to e.g. death of witnesses, destruction or disappearance of documents, etc. The reason for this is the (negative) effect of the passage of time on the evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims. It is also important that the statute barred debt has a mobilising effect on the creditor - he is urged to pursue his claims very quickly (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2-5).


The debt is time-barred after the time specified by law. The general limitation period for debts is currently 6 years. This period has been shortened from 10 years. However, if the [[consumer]] has a debt with the trader, the statute of limitations has not changed and is usually 3 years. In such a period (3 years), the debt on account of the debt becomes statute-barred(O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) :
The debt is time-barred after the time specified by law. The general limitation period for debts is currently 6 years. This period has been shortened from 10 years. However, if the [[consumer]] has a debt with the trader, the statute of limitations has not changed and is usually 3 years. In such a period (3 years), the debt on account of the debt becomes statute-barred(O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) :
* credit agreements;
* credit agreements;
* loan agreements;
* loan agreements;
Line 11: Line 11:
* [[Internet]] and telephone charges.
* [[Internet]] and telephone charges.
* The shorter, because only 1-year limitation period applies to journeys without a valid ticket in mass [[transport]].
* The shorter, because only 1-year limitation period applies to journeys without a valid ticket in mass [[transport]].
On the other hand, the 2-year limitation period applies to bank account debt, the so-called debit on account (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .
On the other hand, the 2-year limitation period applies to bank account debt, the so-called debit on account (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .


==The issue of statute barred debt==
==The issue of statute barred debt==
The legal regulation of the statute barred debt is contained in Title VI of the first book of the Polish Civil Code. Apart from the statute of limitations in civil law, there are also other institutions related to the passage of time (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16):
The legal regulation of the statute barred debt is contained in Title VI of the first book of the Polish Civil Code. Apart from the statute of limitations in civil law, there are also other institutions related to the passage of time (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16):
* '''silence'''
* '''silence'''
* '''convictions'''
* '''convictions'''
* '''deadlines'''
* '''deadlines'''


The effect of the statute barred debt is uniform for all legal entities, i.e. the person against whom the claim is asserted may make a charge of statute of limitations and thus oblige the court to determine whether the statute barred debt is material (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). Thus, the use of the statute of limitations depends solely on the debtor (the court does not examine the statute of limitations ex officio). However, if statute barred debt is not filed, the court examines the case as to its substance. The debtor may be dependent on the court ruling on the dispute and, possibly, releasing the debtor from the charge of evading payment of debts when, for example, the performance was actually fulfilled (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16).
The effect of the statute barred debt is uniform for all legal entities, i.e. the person against whom the claim is asserted may make a charge of statute of limitations and thus oblige the court to determine whether the statute barred debt is material (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). Thus, the use of the statute of limitations depends solely on the debtor (the court does not examine the statute of limitations ex officio). However, if statute barred debt is not filed, the court examines the case as to its substance. The debtor may be dependent on the court ruling on the dispute and, possibly, releasing the debtor from the charge of evading payment of debts when, for example, the performance was actually fulfilled (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16).


Hence, the voluntary performance of a benefit resulting from such an obligation cannot justify a claim for its reimbursement. The benefit is due because the statute of limitations cannot cause the obligation relationship to expire a claim which is pronounced by a final court decision or an agreement concluded before the court also becomes statute-barred, however, in such a case the statute barred debt always amounts to 10 years for such claims (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). If we are dealing with periodical claims, tort claims, etc., i.e. those for which the provisions of the Civil Code provide for a shorter period of time before a judgment is given, and so the period will be 10 years (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .
Hence, the voluntary performance of a benefit resulting from such an obligation cannot justify a claim for its reimbursement. The benefit is due because the statute of limitations cannot cause the obligation relationship to expire a claim which is pronounced by a final court decision or an agreement concluded before the court also becomes statute-barred, however, in such a case the statute barred debt always amounts to 10 years for such claims (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). If we are dealing with periodical claims, tort claims, etc., i.e. those for which the provisions of the Civil Code provide for a shorter period of time before a judgment is given, and so the period will be 10 years (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .


==Functions of the statute barred debt==
==Functions of the statute barred debt==
Line 72: Line 72:


==References==
==References==
* Cordray R., (2016), ''[http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201603_cfpb-fair-debt-collection-practices-act.pdf Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: CFPB Annual Report 2016]'',Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot.,
* Cordray R., (2016), ''[http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201603_cfpb-fair-debt-collection-practices-act.pdf Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: CFPB Annual Report 2016]'',Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot.,  
* Fox J., (2012), ''[https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/110 Do We Have a Debt Collection Crisis? Some Cautionary Tales of Debt Collection in Indiana]'', 24 Loy. Consumer L. Rev  
* Fox J., (2012), ''[https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/110 Do We Have a Debt Collection Crisis? Some Cautionary Tales of Debt Collection in Indiana]'', 24 Loy. Consumer L. Rev  
* Martin N., Goldsmith T.E., (2010), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228182932_Testing_Materiality_Under_the_Unfair_Practices_Acts_What_Information_Matters_When_Collecting_Time-Barred_Debts Testing Materiality Under the Unfair Practices Acts: What Information Matters When Collecting Time-Barred Debts?]'', Factoring, Bad Debt and Collection Agencies,  
* Martin N., Goldsmith T.E., (2010), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228182932_Testing_Materiality_Under_the_Unfair_Practices_Acts_What_Information_Matters_When_Collecting_Time-Barred_Debts Testing Materiality Under the Unfair Practices Acts: What Information Matters When Collecting Time-Barred Debts?]'', Factoring, Bad Debt and Collection Agencies,  
* Medobi O.C., Wigwe Ch., (2017), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331547059_STATUTE_OF_LIMITATION_VIS-A-VIS_COMPULSORY_ACQUISITION_IN_NIGERIA Statute Of Limitation Vis-A-Vis Compulsory Acqusition In Nigeria]'', The Journal Of Property, Vol. 8, No. 1, June 2018,  
* Medobi O.C., Wigwe Ch., (2017), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331547059_STATUTE_OF_LIMITATION_VIS-A-VIS_COMPULSORY_ACQUISITION_IN_NIGERIA Statute Of Limitation Vis-A-Vis Compulsory Acqusition In Nigeria]'', The Journal Of Property, Vol. 8, No. 1, June 2018,  
* McAllister M. C., (2017), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314942595_Ending_Litigation_and_Financial_Windfalls_on_Time-Barred_Debts Ending Litigation and Financial Windfalls on Time-Barred Debts]'', Article in SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2017,
* McAllister M. C., (2017), ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314942595_Ending_Litigation_and_Financial_Windfalls_on_Time-Barred_Debts Ending Litigation and Financial Windfalls on Time-Barred Debts]'', Article in SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2017,
* Reid D.E., (2016), ''[https://rmaintl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/RMA_Whitepaper_OOS.pdf Out-Of-Statute Debt:What Is A Smart, Balanced,And Responsible Approach?]'',Receivables [[Management]] Association International White Paper,  
* Reid D.E., (2016), ''[https://rmaintl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/RMA_Whitepaper_OOS.pdf Out-Of-Statute Debt:What Is A Smart, Balanced,And Responsible Approach?]'',Receivables [[Management]] Association International White Paper,  
{{a|Marzena Rusin}}
{{a|Marzena Rusin}}
[[Category:Controlling]]
[[Category:Controlling]]

Latest revision as of 05:01, 18 November 2023

Statute barred debt is a civil law institution where, after a certain period of time, a debtor may evade performance unless he waives the objection of limitation (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.1).

The statute barred debt is a category linked to the passage of time. It occurs in civil law, financial law, administrative law, criminal law and other branches of material law. The statute of limitations is based on the fact that a debtor, after the lapse of the time limit specified by the law, may evade the performance of the service for the institution of the statute barred debt, the justification is primarily the impact of the passage of time (negative) on evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2).

The category is time related, because after years of evidence cannot be even carried out due to e.g. death of witnesses, destruction or disappearance of documents, etc. The reason for this is the (negative) effect of the passage of time on the evidence which is the basis for the existence of claims. It is also important that the statute barred debt has a mobilising effect on the creditor - he is urged to pursue his claims very quickly (D.E. Reid, 2016, p.2-5).

The debt is time-barred after the time specified by law. The general limitation period for debts is currently 6 years. This period has been shortened from 10 years. However, if the consumer has a debt with the trader, the statute of limitations has not changed and is usually 3 years. In such a period (3 years), the debt on account of the debt becomes statute-barred(O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) :

  • credit agreements;
  • loan agreements;
  • rent;
  • Internet and telephone charges.
  • The shorter, because only 1-year limitation period applies to journeys without a valid ticket in mass transport.

On the other hand, the 2-year limitation period applies to bank account debt, the so-called debit on account (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .

The issue of statute barred debt

The legal regulation of the statute barred debt is contained in Title VI of the first book of the Polish Civil Code. Apart from the statute of limitations in civil law, there are also other institutions related to the passage of time (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16):

  • silence
  • convictions
  • deadlines

The effect of the statute barred debt is uniform for all legal entities, i.e. the person against whom the claim is asserted may make a charge of statute of limitations and thus oblige the court to determine whether the statute barred debt is material (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). Thus, the use of the statute of limitations depends solely on the debtor (the court does not examine the statute of limitations ex officio). However, if statute barred debt is not filed, the court examines the case as to its substance. The debtor may be dependent on the court ruling on the dispute and, possibly, releasing the debtor from the charge of evading payment of debts when, for example, the performance was actually fulfilled (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16).

Hence, the voluntary performance of a benefit resulting from such an obligation cannot justify a claim for its reimbursement. The benefit is due because the statute of limitations cannot cause the obligation relationship to expire a claim which is pronounced by a final court decision or an agreement concluded before the court also becomes statute-barred, however, in such a case the statute barred debt always amounts to 10 years for such claims (M. C. McAllister 2017, p. 12-16). If we are dealing with periodical claims, tort claims, etc., i.e. those for which the provisions of the Civil Code provide for a shorter period of time before a judgment is given, and so the period will be 10 years (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409) .

Functions of the statute barred debt

The social function is mainly to eliminate uncertainty and harmful tensions caused by the discrepancy between the facts and the law. The debtor should not be in a continuous state of danger that the creditor may at any time make his claims known (N. Martin T.E. Goldsmith, 2010, p. 23-25).

Enforcement of claims after a long time has elapsed would face many serious evidentiary difficulties, sometimes insurmountable. It can be assumed that the person entitled will not be interested in the benefits if he has not claimed them for a long time (N. Martin T.E. Goldsmith, 2010, p. 23-25).

Limitation periods for statute barred debt

Limitation periods shall be determined by mandatory legal rules. Accordingly, they may not be extended or shortened by the parties. The following periods of limitation may be specified in the law(O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409):

  • 10 years - this is an essential limitation period if the special rules do not provide for a shorter limitation period in some cases,
  • 3 years - such term applies to claims for periodic benefits (e.g. payment of alimony or rent), claims under the employment relationship, claims related to running a business (regardless of the type of benefits), claims for compensation for damage caused by a tort (excluding damage caused by a crime, then the statute of limitations is 10 years),
  • 3 years and 10 years - this is the situation when one of the parties is a non-professional and the other is a business entity (the condition is that the claims do not apply to periodic benefits). In such a case, the statute of limitations will be different for each of the parties - for a business entity it will be 3 years, and for a non-professional these claims will expire after 10 years,
  • 2 years - we apply to claims for services provided by catering and hotel companies,
  • 1 year - after the expiry of such period, e.g. claims arising from the contract of carriage, warehouse and forwarding become statute-barred (O.C. Medobi, Ch. Wigwe, 2017, pp.406-409).

Course of statute barred debt

The period of limitation generally begins from the date when the claim becomes due (such a date is, for example, the date on which the loan is repaid; it will not be the date on which the loan is granted). The debtor has the right to waive the objection of the statute of limitations, but cannot exercise such a right before the expiry of the statute of limitations (J. Fox, 2012, p. 355).

Suspension shall temporarily halt the running of the limitation period, but when the circumstances which caused the suspension cease to exist, the limitation period shall continue to run and the new period shall count towards the previous period. The limitation period provided for in the legislation may therefore consist of a number of shorter periods, separated by suspension periods (J. Fox, 2012, p. 355). The limitation period does not begin and is suspended (R. Cordray 2016, p. 67-68):

  • As for the claims of children against parents - for the duration of parental authority,
  • As for the claims of persons who do not have full legal capacity against their guardians and guardians, for the duration of their guardianship and guardianship,
  • As regards the claims of one spouse against another, for the duration of the marriage,
  • For all claims where, for reasons of force majeure, the person entitled cannot pursue such claims before a court or other authority competent to hear and determine cases of a particular kind, for the duration of the impediment (R. Cordray 2016, p. 67-68).

The interruption of the limitation period shall have effects going well beyond the suspension. The period of limitation after interruption shall begin to run from the outset. The entire period which has elapsed since the interruption cannot be included in it (R. Cordray 2016, p. 67-68). The interruption of the limitation period causes:

  • Any action taken before a court or other competent authority in order to enforce a claim. Such actions include, first of all, filing a statement of claim and filing a motion to initiate enforcement proceedings,
  • Recognition of the claim by the debtor (R. Cordray 2016, p. 67-68).

Examples of Statute barred debt

  • Unpaid Credit Card Debts: Unpaid credit card debts become statute barred after 6 years in most countries, meaning that the creditor is no longer able to take legal action to collect the debt.
  • Unpaid Parking Tickets: Unpaid parking tickets can become statute barred after a certain period of time, usually 6 years.
  • Unpaid Utility Bills: Unpaid utility bills can become statute barred after a certain period of time, usually 6 years.
  • Unpaid Rent: In some countries, unpaid rent can become statute barred after the tenant has left the property.
  • Unpaid Taxes: Unpaid taxes can become statute barred after a certain period of time, usually 6 years.

Advantages of Statute barred debt

Statute barred debt can offer certain advantages for both debtors and creditors. These advantages include:

  • Affording debtors protection from creditors, as creditors are not allowed to pursue a debt that is statute barred. This serves to protect debtors from the potential financial and emotional stress of dealing with a creditor.
  • Providing creditors with a timeline to pursue a debt, thus allowing them to prioritize their collection efforts and determine which debts can no longer be pursued.
  • Encouraging debtors to take responsibility for their debts and pay them off timely, as past due debts can no longer be pursued after a certain period of time.
  • Allowing creditors to obtain a court order to extend the statute of limitations, if they can prove that the debtor is still liable for the debt.
  • Serving as an incentive for debtors to negotiate a settlement before the statute of limitations period expires, as this could be beneficial for both parties.

Other approaches related to Statute barred debt

One approach to Statute barred debt is to negotiate a repayment plan with creditors, which may include reduced payments or an extended payment term. This can be especially beneficial if the debtor is facing financial hardship and will not be able to repay the full amount of the debt. Another approach is to settle the debt for a lesser amount than is owed. This is often done when the creditor is willing to accept less than the full amount owed in order to recoup some of the money it is owed. Finally, debtors can also file for bankruptcy, which may allow for the full or partial discharge of the debt.


Statute barred debtrecommended articles
Absolute assignmentExecutory considerationHold over tenantEx Gratia PaymentTenancy at WillDeed of surrenderConsent orderAssignment of claimsCertificate of satisfaction

References

Author: Marzena Rusin