Executed consideration: Difference between revisions
(Infobox update) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
If, for example, A offers a reward for the return of lost property, his promise becomes biding when B performs the act of returning A's property to him. The claimant's act in Carlill's case in response to the smoke ball [[company]]'s promise of reward was thus executed consideration<ref>Business Essentials: Business Law 2010, p.80</ref>. | If, for example, A offers a reward for the return of lost property, his promise becomes biding when B performs the act of returning A's property to him. The claimant's act in Carlill's case in response to the smoke ball [[company]]'s promise of reward was thus executed consideration<ref>Business Essentials: Business Law 2010, p.80</ref>. | ||
[[File:valid_executed_or_executory_consideration.png|400px|right|thumb|Fig.1. Valid consideration rules]] | |||
==Types of consideration== | ==Types of consideration== | ||
Consideration can be divided into the following three categories<ref>ACCA: For Exams 2007, p.32-33</ref><ref>L. Roach 2016, p.143-144</ref>: | Consideration can be divided into the following three categories<ref>ACCA: For Exams 2007, p.32-33</ref><ref>L. Roach 2016, p.143-144</ref>: |
Revision as of 15:01, 2 September 2020
Executed consideration |
---|
See also |
Executed consideration is a performed, or executed, act in return for a promise. Therefore, in reward cases, for example, a promise to pay a reward when an act is done becomes enforceable only when that act is performed[1].
Executed consideration, that is, where one party has received a benefit for which he must pay, it is plain that implied contracts are wholly aside from the purpose and intent, as well as without the language of the enactment[2].
If, for example, A offers a reward for the return of lost property, his promise becomes biding when B performs the act of returning A's property to him. The claimant's act in Carlill's case in response to the smoke ball company's promise of reward was thus executed consideration[3].
Types of consideration
Consideration can be divided into the following three categories[4][5]:
- Executory consideration this is a promise to perform an action in return of a promise, at some future time.
Example: Omar promises to do some work in return for a promise of payment; shopkeeper's promise to supply the goods and customer's promise to accept the goods and pay. In the above examples, neither party has yet done any act but each party has given a promise in order to obtain the promise of the other person. It would be a breach of contract if either party withdraw from his/her promise without the consent of the other
- Executed consideration this is an act in return for a promise.
Example:Richard loses his wallet and offers Bogdan a reward if he finds and returns the lost wallet. It is only when Bogdan finds the wallet and duly returns it to Richard that the reward becomes enforceable and the consideration becomes valid.
- Past consideration such consideration, actually is not regarded as a valid consideration. Usually, consideration is provided either at the time of the creation of a contract or at a later date.
Example:Robert mows Mike's lawn and a week later Mike gives a cheque for $10. Robert's work is valid consideration in exchange for the cheque.
Additional rules for valid consideration
As well as being either executed or executory, there are additional rules that must be met for consideration to be valid[6]:
- Performance must be legal, the courts will not enforce payment for illegal acts
- Performance must be possible, agreeing to perform the impossible is not a basis for a biding contract
- Consideration must pass from the promisee
- Consideration must be sufficient but necessarily adequate
Footnotes
References
- ACCA: For Exams, (2007), BPP Learning Media, London.
- ACCA Paper F4- Corp and Business Law, (2012), BPP Learning Media, London.
- Business Essentials: Business Law, (2010), BPP Learning Media, London.
- Roach L., (2016), Card and James' Business Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
- Street T.A., (2000), The History and Theory of English Contract Law, Beard Books, Washington.
Author: Sylwia Jurkowska