Strategic group: Difference between revisions
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Michael E. Porter on the basis of observation of the [[competitive environment]] of enterprises put forward the idea that some firms in the same sector, are similar to each other, because of the chosen development [[strategy]]. Porter called these similar companies: '''strategic groups'''. | Michael E. Porter on the basis of observation of the [[competitive environment]] of enterprises put forward the idea that some firms in the same sector, are similar to each other, because of the chosen development [[strategy]]. Porter called these similar companies: '''strategic groups'''. | ||
They are subsets of the sector, which consists of companies that have pursued a similar approach to the competitive struggle, offering comparable products (with similar [[quality]] and [[price]]), brought to the same [[customer]] segment, resulting in similar [[marketing]] policy, characterized by the same distribution network. | They are subsets of the sector, which consists of companies that have pursued a similar approach to the competitive struggle, offering comparable products (with similar [[quality]] and [[price]]), brought to the same [[customer]] segment, resulting in similar [[marketing]] policy, characterized by the same [[distribution network]]. | ||
==Types of strategic groups== | ==Types of strategic groups== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
The performance of a specific company, is estimated comparing it to the average for its [[industry]] or to the average for the entire [[Strategic Group|strategic group]] for which the [[organization]] belongs. The concept of strategic groups rejects the theory that [[competition]] in the market is to compete with each company in each particular sector, but assumes that it takes place only between companies of the particular group. The analysis of strategic groups allows to understand and anticipate the forms of competitive fighting and areas of concentration of competition. | The performance of a specific company, is estimated comparing it to the average for its [[industry]] or to the average for the entire [[Strategic Group|strategic group]] for which the [[organization]] belongs. The concept of strategic groups rejects the theory that [[competition]] in the market is to compete with each company in each particular sector, but assumes that it takes place only between companies of the particular group. The analysis of strategic groups allows to understand and anticipate the forms of competitive fighting and areas of concentration of competition. | ||
Rivals from different groups often come together wanting to strengthen barriers to entry into the sector, in order to impede imitation strategy used by potential new competitors, and to use the common market, allowing them to achieve benefits in the long run. | Rivals from different groups often come together wanting to strengthen [[barriers to entry]] into the sector, in order to impede imitation strategy used by potential new competitors, and to use the common market, allowing them to achieve benefits in the long run. | ||
In sectors where companies are trying to restrict competition through differentiation strategies, the differences between the groups are the biggest. | In sectors where companies are trying to restrict competition through differentiation strategies, the differences between the groups are the biggest. | ||
Revision as of 02:28, 21 January 2023
| Strategic group |
|---|
| See also |
Michael E. Porter on the basis of observation of the competitive environment of enterprises put forward the idea that some firms in the same sector, are similar to each other, because of the chosen development strategy. Porter called these similar companies: strategic groups.
They are subsets of the sector, which consists of companies that have pursued a similar approach to the competitive struggle, offering comparable products (with similar quality and price), brought to the same customer segment, resulting in similar marketing policy, characterized by the same distribution network.
Types of strategic groups
Criteria (strategic dimension) to separate strategic groups are:
- the degree of vertical integration and horizontal-range of market,
- the technology used for production - level of specialization,
- overall level of costs,
- relations with the parent company and the institutions of public authority,
- brand and company reputation.
The performance of a specific company, is estimated comparing it to the average for its industry or to the average for the entire strategic group for which the organization belongs. The concept of strategic groups rejects the theory that competition in the market is to compete with each company in each particular sector, but assumes that it takes place only between companies of the particular group. The analysis of strategic groups allows to understand and anticipate the forms of competitive fighting and areas of concentration of competition.
Rivals from different groups often come together wanting to strengthen barriers to entry into the sector, in order to impede imitation strategy used by potential new competitors, and to use the common market, allowing them to achieve benefits in the long run.
In sectors where companies are trying to restrict competition through differentiation strategies, the differences between the groups are the biggest.
Its worth noticing that barriers to entry into the sector strategic group and exit from it are called intra-industry mobility barriers, and their analysis provides an answer to the question why companies are finding it hard moving from one group to another.
References
- Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management journal, 27(3), 467-488.
- Mascarenhas, B. (1989). Strategic group dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 333-352.
- Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18(s 1), 165-186.
- Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.
