Vertically integrated supply chain: Difference between revisions
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
m (Text cleaning) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[[Vertical integration]]''' is a [[system]] where a single [[company]] is responsible for managing the entire [[production]] [[process]] from start to finish. This includes sourcing raw materials, manufacturing products, [[marketing]], and distributing them to the [[customer]]. This type of supply chain has a number of advantages that make it an attractive [[option]] for many businesses. | '''[[Vertical integration]]''' is a [[system]] where a single [[company]] is responsible for managing the entire [[production]] [[process]] from start to finish. This includes sourcing raw materials, manufacturing products, [[marketing]], and distributing them to the [[customer]]. This type of supply chain has a number of advantages that make it an attractive [[option]] for many businesses. | ||
Line 66: | Line 50: | ||
Ultimately, there are many alternatives to the traditional vertical supply chain, and businesses should explore the [[options]] that best suit their needs. By exploring different options, businesses can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and gain access to new resources. | Ultimately, there are many alternatives to the traditional vertical supply chain, and businesses should explore the [[options]] that best suit their needs. By exploring different options, businesses can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and gain access to new resources. | ||
== | {{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Logistics and supply chain]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Flexibility in supply chain]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Closed loop supply chain]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Retailer in supply chain]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Processes of supply chain]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Last mile]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Raw material cost]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Trading company]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Horizontal and vertical integration]]}} }} | ||
==References== | |||
* Guan, W., & Rehme, J. (2012). ''[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jakob-Rehme/publication/268504350_Vertical_integration_in_supply_chains_Driving_forces_and_consequences_for_a_manufacturer%27s_downstream_integration/links/55268ab10cf21e126f9e399b/Vertical-integration-in-supply-chains-Driving-forces-and-consequences-for-a-manufacturers-downstream-integration.pdf Vertical integration in supply chains: driving forces and consequences for a manufacturer's downstream integration]''. Supply chain [[management]]: An international Journal, 17(2), 187-201. | * Guan, W., & Rehme, J. (2012). ''[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jakob-Rehme/publication/268504350_Vertical_integration_in_supply_chains_Driving_forces_and_consequences_for_a_manufacturer%27s_downstream_integration/links/55268ab10cf21e126f9e399b/Vertical-integration-in-supply-chains-Driving-forces-and-consequences-for-a-manufacturers-downstream-integration.pdf Vertical integration in supply chains: driving forces and consequences for a manufacturer's downstream integration]''. Supply chain [[management]]: An international Journal, 17(2), 187-201. | ||
* Rosenthal, E. C. (2008). ''[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Edward-Rosenthal/publication/222269251_A_game-theoretic_approach_to_transfer_pricing_in_a_vertically_integrated_supply_chain/links/5d43a504a6fdcc370a743bd5/A-game-theoretic-approach-to-transfer-pricing-in-a-vertically-integrated-supply-chain.pdf A game-theoretic approach to transfer pricing in a vertically integrated supply chain]''. International Journal of Production [[Economics]], 115(2), 542-552. | * Rosenthal, E. C. (2008). ''[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Edward-Rosenthal/publication/222269251_A_game-theoretic_approach_to_transfer_pricing_in_a_vertically_integrated_supply_chain/links/5d43a504a6fdcc370a743bd5/A-game-theoretic-approach-to-transfer-pricing-in-a-vertically-integrated-supply-chain.pdf A game-theoretic approach to transfer pricing in a vertically integrated supply chain]''. International Journal of Production [[Economics]], 115(2), 542-552. | ||
[[Category:Sales_management]] | [[Category:Sales_management]] |
Latest revision as of 06:43, 18 November 2023
Vertical integration is a system where a single company is responsible for managing the entire production process from start to finish. This includes sourcing raw materials, manufacturing products, marketing, and distributing them to the customer. This type of supply chain has a number of advantages that make it an attractive option for many businesses.
One of the main advantages of vertical integration is cost savings. By taking control of the entire production process from start to finish, companies can reduce costs associated with outsourcing different stages of the process. Additionally, vertical integration can lead to improved efficiency as the company is able to better manage the entire process. This type of supply chain also allows the company to have better control over their supply chain, allowing them to better respond to customer needs and market trends.
Quality control is another key benefit of vertical integration. By managing every step of the production process, the company can ensure that the products they produce meet their quality standards. This is especially important when it comes to producing products for customers, as any issues can result in dissatisfied customers and lost sales.
Finally, vertical integration helps to reduce lead times and improve customer service. By having control over the entire production process, companies can better anticipate customer demands and respond quickly to them. This can help to reduce lead times and improve customer satisfaction, as customers will receive their orders more quickly.
Real-World Examples of a Vertically Integrated Supply Chain
Vertical integration is a business strategy that allows companies to control the production and distribution of their products and services. This strategy can be seen in a variety of industries, from tech giants to fast food chains. Let’s take a closer look at a few examples of companies that have successfully adopted this approach.
Apple Inc. is an excellent example of a company that has achieved vertical integration. They have complete control over the design, production, and distribution of their products, and they have their own retail stores, online stores, and direct relationships with suppliers and distributors.
Amazon is another great example. Their integrated supply chain includes warehouses, distribution centers, and a logistics and delivery system. They also have relationships with third-party suppliers and distributors. Walmart follows a similar approach, with their own warehouses, distribution centers, and delivery system.
Coca-Cola has also adopted a vertically integrated supply chain. They have their own bottling and distribution centers, as well as their own logistics and delivery system. Ford Motors has a similar approach, with their own production and assembly plants, logistics and delivery system, and relationships with suppliers and distributors.
Finally, McDonalds has a vertically integrated supply chain that includes their own restaurants and franchises, as well as their own logistics and delivery system. They also have relationships with suppliers and distributors.
The Benefits of Vertical Integration
Vertical integration can lead to a variety of benefits for your business. It can help you better manage inventory, reduce waste, and increase profits. It can also help you better manage your resources, improve flexibility, and reduce risk by limiting reliance on outside suppliers. Plus, it can improve customer service by allowing you to respond quickly to customer needs.
But that's not all. Vertical integration can also lead to improved coordination between different parts of the supply chain, which can help to increase productivity and reduce costs. This means that you can produce more with fewer resources, leading to higher profits and a greater competitive advantage.
Calculating the Effectiveness of a Vertical Supply Chain
The first step is to calculate the cost savings associated with the process. This includes analyzing the cost of raw materials, production, labor, transportation, inventory, and any other costs associated with the process. Measuring the time it takes to produce, package, and deliver goods and services is also important. Assessing the speed of production, the speed of delivery, and the overall quality of the products or services delivered will give you an indication of the effectiveness of the vertical supply chain.
Finally, customer feedback and reviews are key indicators of the effectiveness of a vertical supply chain. Monitoring customer satisfaction and retention rates can tell you how satisfied customers are with the products or services delivered.
A vertically integrated supply chain can be a great way to increase efficiency and cost savings, but it is important to understand the cost and time associated with the process. By measuring the effectiveness of the vertical supply chain, you can ensure that you are getting the most out of your investment.
The Pros and Cons of Vertical Integration
Vertical integration is the process of taking control of the production process by eliminating intermediaries and streamlining resources. It can be a great way to reduce costs, improve quality control, and enhance customer service. However, it also comes with certain risks and upfront costs that must be weighed carefully.
The primary benefit of vertical integration is that it allows for reduced costs. By eliminating intermediaries, companies are able to reduce their expenses and use resources more efficiently. This can lead to improved coordination and control over the entire production process, as well as increased quality control with fewer mistakes and greater consistency. Additionally, the streamlined production and delivery process can lead to improved customer service. Lastly, vertical integration can also increase market share by expanding the range of products and services offered.
On the other hand, there are some potential drawbacks to vertical integration. The biggest risk is that companies may overextend their resources and become overwhelmed with too much responsibility. Additionally, achieving economies of scale can be difficult due to the need to control all aspects of the production process. Furthermore, there is a lack of flexibility in responding to changes in the market or consumer demand. Plus, there are higher upfront costs, such as personnel, equipment, and training, that need to be taken into account. Finally, it can be difficult to diversify product lines or enter new markets.
Alternatives to a Vertical Supply Chain
Do you feel like your vertical supply chain is no longer meeting your company’s needs? If so, it might be time to explore alternative solutions.
Horizontal integration is one option, where multiple companies in the same industry join forces to share resources and reduce costs. By pooling together their resources, businesses can capitalize on economies of scale and gain access to more resources than they would have on their own.
Third-party logistics providers are another alternative. These companies specialize in supply chain operations, and can help streamline processes and increase efficiency. They can also help businesses identify and implement new technologies to reduce manual labor and improve accuracy.
Outsourcing certain aspects of the supply chain is another way to reduce costs. For example, a business may choose to outsource production or distribution to a vendor or partner with expertise in that particular area. This can free up resources for other tasks and reduce overhead costs.
Finally, businesses can leverage technology to automate certain processes and reduce manual labor. Automation can help businesses increase accuracy and reduce costs, making it an attractive option for many businesses.
Ultimately, there are many alternatives to the traditional vertical supply chain, and businesses should explore the options that best suit their needs. By exploring different options, businesses can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and gain access to new resources.
Vertically integrated supply chain — recommended articles |
Logistics and supply chain — Flexibility in supply chain — Closed loop supply chain — Retailer in supply chain — Processes of supply chain — Last mile — Raw material cost — Trading company — Horizontal and vertical integration |
References
- Guan, W., & Rehme, J. (2012). Vertical integration in supply chains: driving forces and consequences for a manufacturer's downstream integration. Supply chain management: An international Journal, 17(2), 187-201.
- Rosenthal, E. C. (2008). A game-theoretic approach to transfer pricing in a vertically integrated supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 542-552.