Matrix structure

From CEOpedia | Management online
Revision as of 20:47, 20 January 2023 by 127.0.0.1 (talk) (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
Matrix structure
See also

Matrix structure was introduced in the 1960s in aerospace industry. NASA has a pioneering role in the use of this structure. The matrix structure is mostly built up around problems or projects in which the organization is involved. They are generally presented as the rows of the matrix. The columns of the matrix are the equivalent of regular, repetitive functions similar to functions in functional structure.

In matrix structure grouping is based on object and functional criteria, there is a double subordination of employees, possible conflicts of competence are addressed through detailed demarcation of responsibility, high flexibility and ease of adaptation to new goals, improved communication.

Applications

Matrix structure in the need for the implementation of certain special projects, which require the establishment of many project teams. Members of those teams are usually permanent employees of other units within the organization.

Delegating of workers may be carried out on the basis of:

  • full exemption from the parent cells at the time of the execution of the project and the total subordination to appointed project team manager.
  • double subordination of workers: to both the head of the parent cell, and the project team manager (this corresponds to a typical matrix structures).

Matrix organizational structure is quite complicated. Not every company can successfully implement it. Use of this structure can lead to many positive and negative phenomena in organization.

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages:

  • creates conditions for interdisciplinary work
  • promotes the development of cooperation skills
  • is flexible
  • promotes a high identification with the objectives
  • create automatic mechanisms for coordination
  • promotes the emergence of synergies

Disadvantages:

  • high management costs
  • the possibility of anarchy
  • longer time to perform tasks (foster discussions rather than action)

See also:

References