Management by delegation: Difference between revisions
m (Infobox update) |
m (Text cleaning) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
By delegating [[management]] is not only the transfer of tasks to [[employee]]s, but also the necessary powers and responsibility for their performance. '''Management by [[delegation]]''' is in contrast to participation, where employees are not granted formal permission to act independently. | By delegating [[management]] is not only the transfer of tasks to [[employee]]s, but also the necessary powers and responsibility for their performance. '''Management by [[delegation]]''' is in contrast to participation, where employees are not granted formal permission to act independently. | ||
Line 27: | Line 10: | ||
* the scope of the powers delegated in writing (whether he was allowed to delegate authority) | * the scope of the powers delegated in writing (whether he was allowed to delegate authority) | ||
* Selection of a person (if a subordinate choice was justified by level of his qualification, [[knowledge]], etc.) | * Selection of a person (if a subordinate choice was justified by level of his qualification, [[knowledge]], etc.) | ||
* Functions of supervision and control (or monitoring and control to be effective and to allow timely correction of errors of subordinates). | * Functions of supervision and control (or [[monitoring and control]] to be effective and to allow timely correction of errors of subordinates). | ||
Advantages of delegation include: | Advantages of delegation include: | ||
Line 74: | Line 57: | ||
* reduced time and improved quality of decisions, | * reduced time and improved quality of decisions, | ||
* increasing employee engagement, | * increasing employee engagement, | ||
* increased use of knowledge and skills, improving employees competence and faster learning. | * increased use of [[knowledge and skills]], improving employees competence and faster learning. | ||
Disadvantages: | Disadvantages: | ||
Line 98: | Line 81: | ||
* The matrix approach is a management method used to assign tasks and responsibilities to team members. It involves [[organizing]] team members into groups and assigning tasks across various groups. | * The matrix approach is a management method used to assign tasks and responsibilities to team members. It involves [[organizing]] team members into groups and assigning tasks across various groups. | ||
* The hierarchical approach is a top-down management [[system]] where authority is concentrated at the top and decisions are made from the top down. The hierarchical approach allows for more centralized control and decision-making, but can limit [[creativity]] and [[innovation]]. | * The hierarchical approach is a top-down management [[system]] where authority is concentrated at the top and decisions are made from the top down. The hierarchical approach allows for more centralized control and decision-making, but can limit [[creativity]] and [[innovation]]. | ||
* The participative approach is a more collaborative [[management system]], where team members are encouraged to take an active role in decision-making and problem-solving. This approach helps to foster a sense of ownership and responsibility among team members and can lead to better performance. | * The participative approach is a more collaborative [[management system]], where team members are encouraged to take an active role in decision-making and problem-solving. This approach helps to foster a [[sense of ownership]] and responsibility among team members and can lead to better performance. | ||
In summary, management by delegation is only one of several approaches to management. Other approaches include the matrix approach, the hierarchical approach, and the participative approach. Each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses, and can be used to achieve different management goals. | In summary, management by delegation is only one of several approaches to management. Other approaches include the matrix approach, the hierarchical approach, and the participative approach. Each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses, and can be used to achieve different management goals. | ||
{{infobox5|list1={{i5link|a=[[Delegation of authority]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Distribution of decision-making powers]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Delegative leadership]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Free rein leadership]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Lewin, Lippitt and White - basic styles of management]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Importance of teamwork]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Management by conflict]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Hersey and Blanchard model]]}} — {{i5link|a=[[Front line management]]}} }} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 109: | Line 94: | ||
* Telang, P. R., & Singh, M. P. (2009). ''[http://www.csc2.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-socase-09.pdf Business modeling via commitments]''. In [[Service]]-Oriented Computing: Agents, Semantics, and Engineering (p. 111-125). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. | * Telang, P. R., & Singh, M. P. (2009). ''[http://www.csc2.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/aamas-socase-09.pdf Business modeling via commitments]''. In [[Service]]-Oriented Computing: Agents, Semantics, and Engineering (p. 111-125). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. | ||
* Urwick, L. F. (1922). ''[http://mail.nickols.us/Span.pdf The manager's span of control]''. Harvard Business Review, 34(3). | * Urwick, L. F. (1922). ''[http://mail.nickols.us/Span.pdf The manager's span of control]''. Harvard Business Review, 34(3). | ||
[[Category:Management by...]] | [[Category:Management by...]] | ||
[[pl:Zarządzanie przez delegowanie]] | [[pl:Zarządzanie przez delegowanie]] |
Latest revision as of 00:15, 18 November 2023
By delegating management is not only the transfer of tasks to employees, but also the necessary powers and responsibility for their performance. Management by delegation is in contrast to participation, where employees are not granted formal permission to act independently.
Delegating is a concept associated with the specifics of managerial work. Manager entrust to subordinate implementation of specific goals, leaving him some freedom, independence of decision-making and the choice of means and methods.
Efficient management is the art of achieving the objectives with the help of the people. One of the components of such a management is the delegation of powers to the subordinates. By delegating the assignment of work to someone else comes together with providing his formal authority, responsibility and resources necessary to carry out specific tasks. The importance of this issue has caused many specialists in the field of organization and management to found a delegation as a distinct management technique.
Delegation of powers leads to the division of responsibility between the manager and subordinate (dual responsibility). It is, however, in each case another responsibility (responsibility for something else). The dilemma relates to the division of responsibility between the manager and a subordinate regarding their competences.
In the event of misuse of its powers by a subordinate, which has delegated powers, superior responsibility applies to following matters:
- the scope of the powers delegated in writing (whether he was allowed to delegate authority)
- Selection of a person (if a subordinate choice was justified by level of his qualification, knowledge, etc.)
- Functions of supervision and control (or monitoring and control to be effective and to allow timely correction of errors of subordinates).
Advantages of delegation include:
Problems in management by delegation
There are some difficulties that arise during delegation: On the part of managers:
- sense of insecurity in the organization - when tasks are performed well by employees,
- fear of losing power, the need to control all of the tasks,
- lack of trust in employees (the fear that the task will not be executed properly)
- lack of self-confidence and sense of security.
On the part of the employees:
- fear of criticism and embarrassment,
- risk avoidance,
- lack of incentives to take up the challenge and low intrinsic motivation,
- low commitment to the organization,
- lack of self-confidence and sense of security.
Basic principles of management by delegation
- clarification of the scope of tasks and powers,
- ensuring the compliance of the tasks, skills (knowledge and experiences), and the competence of the employee,
- respect employee's right to refuse the acceptance of new powers,
- monitoring of the implementation of delegated tasks.
To delegation most susceptible are following decision-making powers:
- with short time-frame of impact,
- with small scale impact,
- in technical rather than human matters,
- with low uncertainty,
- repetitive.
Usually managers do not delegate the powers in the following fields: disciplining employees, finance, investment, organizational structure, strategy, employment, corporate image.
The trap that managers should avoid, is the back-delegation. It appears when the employee refers to the supervisor with the problem regarding of delegated tasks, and asks him to personally solve it. Employee should proposed a solution or range of solution for managers to choose.
Management by delegation requires efficient exchange of information between the manager and the staff. Management by delegation may be implemented in the organization gradually.
Advantages and disadvantages of management by delegation
Advantages:
- relieving managers from secondary tasks which enable them to focus on the most important activities,
- overcoming passivity among employees of lower levels,
- opportunity to try the independent action by the workers targeted for promotion,
- ability to enhance the status of employees on a lower organizational level,
- better quality and higher speed of decision making.
- reduced time and improved quality of decisions,
- increasing employee engagement,
- increased use of knowledge and skills, improving employees competence and faster learning.
Disadvantages:
- this method favours the bureaucracy,
- excessive formalization,
- potential reluctance to delegate authority
Principles of management by delegation
- There shall be tasks reserved for implementation only by the top management of the organization (goal setting, strategy and organizational structure, long-term strategic planning, coordination of the various areas of activity, human resources policy)!
- subordinates, with delegated powers bear personal responsibility for the actions, while the responsibility of superiors is limited to the supervision and control of the results!
- It is necessary to control the exchange of information between superiors and employees!
- managers should delegate not only simple tasks, but also more complex tasks!
- Do not delegate the tasks which the employee does not know exactly!
- Routine tasks should not dominate tasks delegated!
Examples of Management by delegation
- Delegating the task of setting up a new office to a team of experienced employees: This is a common example of management by delegation, where the team is given the responsibility and authority to complete the task without requiring direct oversight or intervention from the manager.
- Allowing employees to manage their own time: This is a form of delegation that can be beneficial for both employees and employers. By allowing employees to manage their own time, they are given the freedom to work on tasks that they are best suited to, while also taking responsibility for their own performance.
- Assigning a project to a large team: This is another example of management by delegation, where a manager assigns a project to a team of employees and gives them the responsibility to complete the task. The team is given the necessary authority and resources to complete the project in the most efficient way possible.
In addition to management by delegation, there are several other approaches related to management:
- The matrix approach is a management method used to assign tasks and responsibilities to team members. It involves organizing team members into groups and assigning tasks across various groups.
- The hierarchical approach is a top-down management system where authority is concentrated at the top and decisions are made from the top down. The hierarchical approach allows for more centralized control and decision-making, but can limit creativity and innovation.
- The participative approach is a more collaborative management system, where team members are encouraged to take an active role in decision-making and problem-solving. This approach helps to foster a sense of ownership and responsibility among team members and can lead to better performance.
In summary, management by delegation is only one of several approaches to management. Other approaches include the matrix approach, the hierarchical approach, and the participative approach. Each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses, and can be used to achieve different management goals.
Management by delegation — recommended articles |
Delegation of authority — Distribution of decision-making powers — Delegative leadership — Free rein leadership — Lewin, Lippitt and White - basic styles of management — Importance of teamwork — Management by conflict — Hersey and Blanchard model — Front line management |
References
- Bass, B. M., Valenzi, E. R., Farrow, D. L., & Solomon, R. J. (1975). Management styles associated with organizational, task, personal, and interpersonal contingencies. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(6), 720.
- Muir, J. (1995). Effective management through delegation. Work study, 44(7), 6-7.
- Mullins, L. J. (2007). Management and organisational behaviour. Pearson education.
- Nagar, V. (2002). Delegation and incentive compensation. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 379-395.
- Telang, P. R., & Singh, M. P. (2009). Business modeling via commitments. In Service-Oriented Computing: Agents, Semantics, and Engineering (p. 111-125). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Urwick, L. F. (1922). The manager's span of control. Harvard Business Review, 34(3).