Total quality control
Total quality control |
---|
See also |
|list1=
|list2=
|list3=
- kaizen
- kanban
}}
TQC - Total Quality Control is a system developed by Armand Feigenbaum to integrate the efforts of different groups of employees within the organization to develop quality management methods, maintain and improve standards and procedures. The aim is to achieve efficient production or service performance at an economically justifiable level, while at the same time achieving full customer satisfaction. The wording Total Quality Control cannot be confused with quality control. [1].
Company-Wide Quality
Comprehensiveness means that actions taken to eliminate errors must be carried out in all areas of the company's operations. Commitment to quality management is the responsibility of everyone, from the serial employee to the president, and not just the quality controller. Quality is not created in the production hall, and certainly not at the stage of quality control of the finished product [2]. Its level is influenced by the employees of the marketing department, project office, finance department, accountancy, purchasing and others [3]. Therefore, at the beginning of the 1970s this approach was called Company-Wide Quality Control, i.e. quality management on a company-wide scale. Concern for quality should be a priority at all levels of the company's activity [4].
Costs of errors according to Feigenbaum
The systematic approach to a comprehensive view of quality indicates the need to use statistical tools to set quality standards. Once they have been established, all activities are assessed for compliance with the standards. Improvement of quality standards assumes the application of corrective and preventive actions [5]. When setting standards, standards for the cost of errors should also be defined. Only a company that controls costs can effectively control quality. Implementation of pro-quality solutions is to make it possible to determine the type of errors and the amount of losses related to them (costs of errors), as well as to determine the expenditure on the prevention of errors and their consequences (prevention costs and evaluation costs) [6]. The costs of errors were divided by Mr Feigenbaum into two groups [7]:
- costs of internal errors (waste exceeding the specification's 'technologically justifiable' level, materials needed for corrections, time spent by staff on additional corrective action),
- costs of external errors (warranty claims, post-warranty claims, product liability, costs of product recall as a result of the presence of dangerous product defects, e.g. toxic substances in consumer goods).
As you can see, product liability covers costs caused by a defective product that has proven to be dangerous to the environment. Therefore, quality control activities are to focus not only on the inside of the company, but also on the impact on the environment [8].
The concealed factory concept
Costs incurred to prevent errors include prevention and evaluation costs. Prevention costs include: purchase of measuring equipment, preparation of the optimal design, development and improvement of the quality system, quality management training [9] The cost of evaluation includes the following costs: control of purchased raw materials (working time of employees and necessary preparations or reagents), handling of non-conforming products (storage, handling), recording of results, as well as the cost of operating measuring equipment and the cost of auditing by an external entity. Quality control costs and error costs are to be minimised by improving quality management programmes [10]. Therefore, in addition to the costs of errors and prevention, the costs of control should be measured. This has led to the formulation of the "hidden factory" concept. It assumes that when a full set of additional tasks has to be carried out when correcting errors (activities that were not planned but have to be carried out), something like a second circuit called a "hidden factory" is created. There are activities that should not be carried out there [11].
Total Quality Management
Nowadays, many companies use the idea of A. Feigenbaum. The concept of TQC was finally transformed into the concept of Total Quality Management, which is probably the most frequently quoted slogan in the sphere of quality, and which undeniably derives from his idea. Feigenbaum's demands for the development of a quality cost model were used in the 1994 version of ISO 9004. In interviews given in the current decade, Feigenbaum claims that today's global competitive market, using advanced technologies, creates even greater pressure on quality [12].
References:
- Kerzner H., (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning,Scheduling, and Controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.17.
- Montgomery D. C., (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (6th ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Arizona State University
- Neyestani B., Juanzon J. G. P. (2016).Identification of A Set of Appropriate Critical Success Factors CSFs) for Successful TQM Implementation in Construction, and Other Industries. International Journalof Advanced Research, 4(11), pp. 1581–1591.20.
- Neyestani B., Juanzon J. G. P. (2016). Developing an Appropriate Performance Measurement Framework for Total Quality Management (TQM) in Construction and Other Industries. IRA-International Journal of Technology &Engineering, 5(2), pp. 32–44
- Neyestani B., 2016. Effectiveness of Quality Management System (QMS)on Construction Projects. Department of Civil Engineering, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. Behnam Neyestani
- Behnam Neyestan (2016,December) Effectiveness of Quality management system|Quality Management System (QMS) on Construction Projects
- Neyestani B. 2017, Principles and Contributions of Total Quality Mangement (TQM) Gurus on Business Quality Improvement. Department of Civil Engineering, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
- Behnam Neyestani(2017, February) Principles and Contributions of Total Quality Mangement (TQM) Gurus on Business [[Quality improvement|Quality Improvement
- Sokovic, M., Pavletic D., & Pipan, K.K. (2010). Quality Improvement Methodologies – PDCA Cycle, RADAR Matrix, DMAIC and DFSS, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 43(1), pp.476–483.
- Watson G.H., (2005, November) Feigenbaum’s Enduring Influence
Footnotes
- ↑ Neyestani, Juanzon, 2016, pp. 1581–1591
- ↑ Neyestani, Juanzon, 2016, pp. 1581–1591
- ↑ Montgomery, 2009, pp. 5-9
- ↑ Neyestani 2017, pp.3-6)
- ↑ Neyestani, Juanzon, 2016, pp. 32–44)
- ↑ Watson 2005, pp. 51-56
- ↑ Neyestani, Juanzon, 2016, pp. 1581–1591
- ↑ Neyestani, Juanzon, 2016, pp. 1581–1591
- ↑ Sokovic, Pavletic Pipan, 2010 pp. 476–483.
- ↑ Sokovic, Pavletic Pipan, 2010 pp. 476–483
- ↑ Watson 2005, pp. 51-56)
- ↑ Neyestani 2017, pp.3-6
Author: Justyna Wąsiołek